...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America >Evaluating accuracy and precision of species—area relationships for multiple estimators and different marine assemblages
【24h】

Evaluating accuracy and precision of species—area relationships for multiple estimators and different marine assemblages

机译:评估物种的准确性和精确性-多个估计量和不同海洋组合的面积关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper evaluates the accuracy and precision of six nonparametric estimators and six regression models for predicting the number of species in an area using random subsamples of that area. Such extrapolations are important for increased understanding of species—area relationships in different assemblages of species to inform ecological theories, and because they have direct implications in many conservation issues. Often, such extrapolations are evaluated by considering how well they fit existing data, rather than the actual number of species in the larger area. Also, many studies have focused on larger species in terrestrial habitats, where numbers of species are quite well known. Assemblages of invertebrates and smaller plants, especially in marine habitats, are less well known, and their distributions are dominated by small-scale variability. We examined species—area relations for two assemblages on boulders from six locations, for rocky shore assemblages in three locations, and for gastropods colonizing artificial habitat. Changing the focus of subsampling relative to the extent of the study and changing the size of the subsamples was also evaluated for subsets of data. Most estimators fitted the number of species poorly, with the second-order Jackknife consistently the best of the nonparametric measures, and the Negative Exponential the best of the regression models. Increasing the number of replicates improved most models, but some only slightly, and others considerably. Changing focus had little effect, probably because marine assemblages such as these vary at small scales as much as at many larger scales. These extensive analyses provide clear evidence about which estimators should not be used for measuring species—area relationships in assemblages such as these, and which will consistently over- or underestimate the number of species. The findings are applicable to many assemblages dominated by small organisms with strong stochastic variation.
机译:本文评估了六个非参数估计量和六个回归模型的准确性和精确度,这些模型使用该区域的随机子样本来预测该区域的物种数量。这种推断对于增进对物种的了解非常重要,因为物种之间在不同物种集合中的区域关系可以为生态学理论提供依据,并且它们在许多保护问题中都有直接的含义。通常,通过考虑这些推断与现有数据的拟合程度,而不是考虑较大区域中物种的实际数量,来评估这些推断。此外,许多研究都集中在陆地生境中较大的物种上,那里的物种数量众所周知。无脊椎动物和小型植物的组合,尤其是在海洋栖息地中,鲜为人知,它们的分布以小规模的变异性为主。我们研究了物种—区域之间的关系,这些关系来自六个地点的两个大石块组合,三个地点的多石海岸组合以及定居在人工栖息地的腹足纲动物。还针对数据子集评估了相对于研究范围改变子采样的重点和改变子样本的大小。大多数估计量拟合物种的数量都很差,二阶折刀一直是非参数度量中最好的,而负指数是回归模型中最好的。复制数量的增加改善了大多数模型,但其中一些模型仅得到了轻微改进,而其他模型则有了很大改进。改变焦点影响不大,可能是因为这样的海洋组合在小规模和许多大尺度上变化很大。这些广泛的分析提供了明确的证据,说明哪些估算器不应该用于度量物种—诸如此类的组合中的区域关系,而哪些将始终高估或低估物种的数量。该发现适用于以随机变化强烈的小型生物为主的许多组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号