...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecosystems >Belowground Ecosystem Recovery During Grassland Restoration: South African Highveld Compared to US Tallgrass Prairie
【24h】

Belowground Ecosystem Recovery During Grassland Restoration: South African Highveld Compared to US Tallgrass Prairie

机译:草地恢复过程中的地下生态系统恢复:南非Highveld与美国高草草原比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Conversion of cultivated land to grassland is globally practiced to reverse soil degradation, but belowground ecosystem response to restoration has never been compared between old and new world temperate grasslands. We used a chronosequence approach to model change in root biomass and quality (indexed by C:N ratio), microbial biomass and composition [indexed by phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs)], soil aggregate structure, and soil C and N stocks in the South African Highveld and compared recovery of these variables to a grassland restoration chronosequence in the US tallgrass prairie. We hypothesized soil C recovery, and mechanisms promoting soil C and N accrual would be convergent between these distant temperate grasslands with similar growing season precipitation, history of cultivation, and undergoing restoration with C-4-grasses. Total PLFA richness and concentrations of most microbial groups rose to represent uncultivated grassland in the highveld (similar to tallgrass prairie), but in contrast to tallgrass prairie, the fungi:bacteria ratio did not increase with restoration age. In the highveld, root biomass accumulation was lower, but root quality became more representative of the never-cultivated grassland than in restorations in tallgrass prairie. Soil aggregate recovery was slightly faster in tallgrass prairie, and the pattern of macroaggregate C recovery was divergent due to less depletion in cultivated soil and higher stock of C in the uncultivated soil relative to the highveld. More rapid restoration of total soil C and N stocks in the highveld was attributed to greater soil C saturation deficit at the onset of restoration, development of higher quality root systems that promote the microbial biomass and soil aggregation, and climate conditions (distinct periodicity of rainfall and high aridity) that likely impose more limitation to decomposition relative to the tallgrass prairie ecosystem.
机译:在全球范围内,人们普遍将耕地转换为草地,以扭转土壤退化的趋势,但是从未将新旧世界温带草原的地下生态系统对恢复的反应进行比较。我们使用时间序列方法来模拟南方根系生物量和质量(以C:N比索引),微生物生物量和组成[以磷脂脂肪酸(PLFAs索引)],土壤团聚体结构以及土壤碳和氮储量的变化非洲Highveld并将这些变量的恢复与美国高草草原的草地恢复时间序列进行了比较。我们假设了土壤C的恢复,促进土壤C和N累积的机制将在这些生长季节相似的降水,耕种历史和经历C-4-草恢复的遥远温带草原之间收敛。 PLFA的总富集度和大多数微生物群的浓度上升,以代表草丛中未耕种的草地(类似于高草草原),但与高草草原相反,真菌:细菌的比率并未随恢复年龄的增加而增加。在草丛中,根生物量的积累较低,但与高草草原的修复体相比,从未耕种的草地更能代表根质量。高草草原土壤的团聚体恢复略快,由于相对于耕地,耕种土壤中的耗竭较少而未耕种土壤中的C蓄积量较高,因此大集料C的回收模式有所不同。高地土壤中总碳和氮储量的更快恢复归因于恢复开始时更大的土壤碳饱和度亏缺,发展了促进微生物生物量和土壤聚集的高质量根系,以及气候条件(降雨的周期性不同)。和高干旱),相对于草丛草原生态系统,分解可能受到更多限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号