...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Modelling >Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning
【24h】

Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning

机译:米兰的空气质量预测:前馈神经网络,修剪的神经网络和惰性学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ozone and PM10 constitute the major concern for air quality of Milan. This paper addresses the problem of the prediction of such two pollutants, using to this end several statistical approaches. In particular, feed-forward neural networks (FFNNs), currently recognized as state-of-the-art approach for statistical prediction of air quality, are compared with two alternative approaches derived from machine learning: pruned neural networks (PNNs) and lazy learning (LL). PNNs constitute a parameter-parsimonious approach, based on the removal of redundant parameters from fully connected neural networks; LL, on the other hand, is a local linear prediction algorithm, which performs a local learning procedure each time a prediction is required. All the three approaches are tested in the prediction of ozone and PM10; predictors are trained to return at 9 a.m. the concentration estimated for the current day.No strong differences are found between the forecast accuracies of the different models; nevertheless, LL provides the best performances on indicators related to average goodness of the prediction (correlation, mean absolute error, etc.), while PNNs are superior to the other approaches in detecting of the exceedances of alarm and attention thresholds. In some cases, data-deseasonalization is found to improve the prediction accuracy of the models.Finally, some striking features of lazy learning deserve consideration: the LL predictor can be quickly designed, and, thanks to the simplicity of the local linear regressors, it both gets rid of overfitting problems and can be readily interpreted; moreover, it can be also easily kept up-to-date. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:臭氧和PM10构成了米兰空气质量的主要问题。为此,本文使用几种统计方法解决了预测这两种污染物的问题。特别是,将目前公认的最先进的空气质量统计预测方法前馈神经网络(FFNN)与源自机器学习的两种替代方法进行了比较:修剪神经网络(PNN)和惰性学习(二)。基于从完全连接的神经网络中删除冗余参数,PNN构成了一种参数简约方法。另一方面,LL是一种局部线性预测算法,它在每次需要进行预测时都执行局部学习过程。这三种方法都在臭氧和PM10的预测中进行了测试。预报员经过训练可以在当日上午9点返回当天的估计浓度,不同模型的预报精度之间没有发现重大差异;但是,LL在与预测的平均良好度(相关性,平均绝对误差等)相关的指标上提供了最佳性能,而PNN在检测警报和注意阈值是否超出方面优于其他方法。在某些情况下,发现数据反季节化可以提高模型的预测准确性。最后,值得考虑的一些懒惰学习的显着特征:可以快速设计LL预测器,并且由于局部线性回归器的简单性,它可​​以都摆脱了过度拟合的问题,并且可以轻松地进行解释;此外,它也可以轻松保持最新状态。 (c)2005 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号