...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Modelling >BIASED PREDICTIONS FOR TREE HEIGHT INCREMENT MODELS DEVELOPED FROM SMOOTHED DATA
【24h】

BIASED PREDICTIONS FOR TREE HEIGHT INCREMENT MODELS DEVELOPED FROM SMOOTHED DATA

机译:从平滑数据开发的树高增量模型的偏向预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Only two basic methods exist for obtaining tree height (H) increment data: felled tree measurements and remeasured height or height increment on standing forest trees. Because the former method is expensive (but reliable), and the latter has a large measurement error relative to the actual height increment, it is difficult to obtain good height increment data. The contradictory occurrence of high coefficients of determination for height increment models that are not based on felled-tree samples can only be explained by so-called height increment 'data' that is actually predicted from some heuristic function, usually of diameter. Such smoothed 'data' are not observable, not measurable, and have much Variation removed. Use of smoothed data reduces the apparent problem of height increment modeling to a simplistic problem of using one function to estimate the smoothed predictions from another function. We illustrate this phenomenon with a controlled experiment. Using more than 7500 Norway spruce trees from the Austrian National Forest Inventory with remeasured heights (5 year interval), we built height increment models: (1) based on the difference in observed heights; (2) based on the difference in predicted heights using a heuristic function of diameter. Using the same model and input variables, the coefficient of determination was 3 times higher (0.44 vs. 0.14) using the smoothed increment 'data' than with the observed increment data. Furthermore the increment predictions based on the data sets with smoothed increment 'data' exhibited a significant overestimation. This demonstrates three things. First, that fit statistics measuring deviations about smoothed height increment data an misleading and strongly biased upward. Second, that the resulting models produce biased predictions that overestimate increment, especially for trees in an intermediate to suppressed social position in the stand. Third, that measurement errors in remeasured heights on standing trees are so large that the underlying height increment signal is nearly hidden (R-2 = 0.14). [References: 40]
机译:仅存在两种用于获取树高(H)增量数据的基本方法:砍伐树木的测量值和重测立木的高度或高度的增量。由于前一种方法昂贵(但可靠),而后一种方法相对于实际的高度增量具有较大的测量误差,因此很难获得良好的高度增量数据。对于不是基于砍伐树样本的高度增量模型,高确定系数的矛盾发生只能通过所谓的高度增量“数据”来解释,该数据实际上是从某些启发式函数(通常是直径)中预测的。这样平滑的“数据”是不可观察的,不可测量的,并且去除了很多变化。使用平滑数据将明显的高度增量建模问题简化为使用一个函数从另一个函数估计平滑预测的简单问题。我们通过对照实验说明了这种现象。使用来自奥地利国家森林清单的超过7500棵挪威云杉树木,并重新测量了高度(5年间隔),我们建立了高度增量模型:(1)基于观测到的高度差; (2)使用直径启发式函数基于预测高度的差异。使用相同的模型和输入变量,使用平滑增量“数据”的确定系数比观察到的增量数据高3倍(0.44对0.14)。此外,基于具有平滑增量“数据”的数据集的增量预测表现出明显的高估。这说明了三件事。首先,用于测量有关平滑高度增量数据的偏差的拟合统计数据具有误导性,并且强烈向上偏置。其次,生成的模型产生的偏差预测会高估增量,尤其是对于林中处于中间位置或处于抑制状态的树木而言。第三,立木上重新测量的高度的测量误差太大,以至于潜在的高度增量信号几乎被隐藏了(R-2 = 0.14)。 [参考:40]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号