首页> 外文期刊>Earth and Planetary Science Letters: A Letter Journal Devoted to the Development in Time of the Earth and Planetary System >Young eclogite from the Greater Himalayan Sequence, Arun Valley, eastern Nepal: P-T-t path and tectonic implications
【24h】

Young eclogite from the Greater Himalayan Sequence, Arun Valley, eastern Nepal: P-T-t path and tectonic implications

机译:尼泊尔东部阿伦河谷大喜马拉雅层序的年轻榴辉岩:P-T-t路径和构造意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Garnet geochronology was used to provide the first direct measurement of the timing of eclogitization in the central Himalaya. Lu-Hf dates from garnet separates in one relict eclogite from the Arun River Valley in eastern Nepal indicate an age of 20.7 +/- 0.4 Ma, significantly younger than ultra-high pressure eclogites from the western Himalaya, reflecting either different origins or substantial time lags in tectonics along strike. Four proximal garnet amphibolites from structurally lower horizons are 14-15 Ma, similar to post-eclogitization ages published for rocks along strike in southern Tibet. P-T calculations indicate three metamorphic episodes for the eclogite: i) eclogite-facies metamorphism at similar to 670 degrees C and >= 15 kbar at 23-16 Ma; ii) a peak-T granulite event at similar to 780 degrees C and 12 kbar; and iii) late-stage amphibolite-facies metamorphism at similar to 675 degrees C and 6 kbar at similar to 14 Ma. The garnet amphibolites were metamorphosed at similar to 660 degrees C. Three models are considered to explain the observed P-T-t evolution. The first assumes that the Main Himalayan Thrust (basal thrust of the Himalayan thrust system) cuts deeper at Arun than elsewhere. While conceptually the simplest, this model has difficulty explaining both the granulite-facies overprint and the pulse of exhumation between 25 and 14 Ma. A second model assumes that (aborted) subduction, slab breakoff, and ascent of India's leading edge occurred diachronously: similar to 50 Ma in the western Himalaya, similar to 25 Ma in the central Himalaya of Nepal, and presumably later in the eastern Himalaya. This model explains the P-T-t path, particularly heating during initial exhumation, but implies significant along-strike diachroneity, which is generally lacking in other features of the Himalaya. A third model assumes repeated loss of mantle lithosphere, first by slab breakoff at similar to 50 Ma, and again by delamination at similar to 25 Ma; this model explains the P-T-t path, but requires geographically restricted tectonic behavior at Arun. The P-T-t history of the Arun eclogites may imply a change in the physical state of the Himalayan metamorphic wedge at 16-25 Ma, ultimately giving rise to the Main Central Thrust by 15-16 Ma.
机译:石榴石年代学用于首次直接测量喜马拉雅山中部岩石化的时间。来自尼泊尔东部阿伦河谷的一块遗留榴辉岩中石榴石分离的Lu-Hf日期表明其年龄为20.7 +/- 0.4 Ma,比喜马拉雅西部的超高压榴辉岩明显年轻,反映出不同的起源或相当长的时间沿罢工构造滞后。在构造上较低的层位上有四个近邻的石榴石角闪石,为14-15 Ma,与西藏南部沿走向的岩石发表的后凝结时代相似。 P-T计算表明该榴辉岩发生了三个变质事件:i)榴辉岩相变质作用类似于670摄氏度,且在23-16 Ma时> = 15 kbar; ii)类似于780摄氏度和12 kbar的T峰值粒岩事件; iii)晚期闪石相变质作用类似于675摄氏度,而6 kbar相似于14 Ma。石榴石闪石在约660摄氏度的温度下变形。考虑使用三种模型来解释观察到的P-T-t演化。第一个假设是,喜马拉雅山主推力(喜马拉雅山推力系统​​的基本推力)在阿伦的切割深度比其他地方都大。虽然从概念上讲是最简单的,但是该模型很难解释25至14 Ma之间的花岗岩相叠印和掘出脉动。第二种模型假设(堕落的)俯冲,平板断裂和印度前缘上升是同步发生的:在喜马拉雅山西部地区类似于50 Ma,在尼泊尔喜马拉雅中部地区类似于25 Ma,大概是在喜马拉雅东部地区。该模型解释了P-T-t路径,特别是在最初发掘尸体的过程中加热,但暗示了严重的沿行程铁断面,这通常是喜马拉雅山其他特征所缺乏的。第三种模型假设地幔岩石圈反复丢失,首先是在大约50 Ma时断层板破裂,然后在大约25 Ma时断层分层。该模型解释了P-T-t路径,但是需要在Arun进行地理限制的构造行为。阿伦(Arun)榴辉岩的P-T-t历史可能暗示喜马拉雅变质楔体的物理状态在16-25 Ma发生了变化,最终在15-16 Ma形成了主中心逆冲推力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号