首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >Slow Down and Reach Out (and We'll Be There): A Response to 'Shellfish as Living Infrastructure' by Kate Orff
【24h】

Slow Down and Reach Out (and We'll Be There): A Response to 'Shellfish as Living Infrastructure' by Kate Orff

机译:放慢脚步,伸手出去(而且我们会在那里):凯特·奥尔夫(Kate Orff)对“贝类作为生活基础设施”的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Historically New York Harbor supported hundreds of square kilometers of oyster beds, yielding perhaps 700 million harvested oysters per year at its peak in the late 1880s (Kurlansky 2006, Royte 2006, Bain et al. 2007). By the 1920s, the beds had become unharvestable because of depletion of the resource and closures from raw sewage contamination (reviewed in Kirby 2004). When the Hudson River Foundation took the lead in investigating the feasibility of restoring oyster populations and the reefs they form in the New York Harbor region, they assembled a team of scientists in 2009 from around the U.S. with expertise in oyster restoration, aquaculture, ecology, pathology, genetics, and other disciplines. The initial result was the Oyster Restoration Research Project (ORRP) which was designed to build upon previous studies in the region (e.g., Franz 1982, Bain et al. 2007, Starke et al. 2011) and assess oyster restoration potential at five sites, each with different environmental regimes, from the lower Hudson River to Staten Island. Phase 1 of this study was completed in 2012 (Grizzle et al. 2013) and Phase 2 is underway, focusing on larger scale restoration at one pilot site in the Bronx at Sound-view Park. Orff briefly describes these efforts in her essay, and both of us have been a part of the project since before 2009. Based on our experiences in the region and elsewhere we are responding to Orff's essay "Shellfish as Living Infrastructure," providing some context from our restoration work and others. Our aim here is to comment on her proposed approaches in light of a shifting focus in the last few decades to oyster restoration for ecological reasons rather than mainly human harvest.
机译:从历史上看,纽约港拥有数百平方公里的牡蛎床,在1880年代后期的高峰期,每年可能收获约7亿只牡蛎(Kurlansky 2006,Royte 2006,Bain等人2007)。到1920年代,由于资源枯竭和封闭的原始污水污染,这些床已经变得无法收割(在Kirby 2004中进行了综述)。当哈德逊河基金会率先研究恢复牡蛎种群及其在纽约港区形成的珊瑚礁的可行性时,他们于2009年组建了一支由美国各地组成的科学家团队,他们拥有牡蛎修复,水产养殖,生态学,病理学,遗传学和其他学科。最初的结果是牡蛎修复研究项目(ORRP),其目的是基于该地区以前的研究(例如Franz 1982,Bain等2007,Starke等2011)并评估五个地点的牡蛎修复潜力,从下哈德逊河到史泰登岛,每个国家都有不同的环境制度。这项研究的第一阶段已于2012年完成(Grizzle等,2013),第二阶段正在进行中,重点是在声景公园布朗克斯的一个试验点进行大规模修复。 Orff在她的论文中简要介绍了这些努力,自2009年之前,我们俩都一直是该项目的一部分。基于我们在该地区和其他地区的经验,我们正在响应Orff的论文《作为生存基础设施的贝类》,提供了一些背景信息。我们的修复工作和其他工作。我们的目的是鉴于最近几十年来出于生态原因而非主要是人类收获而将牡蛎恢复的重点转移,对她提出的方法进行评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号