首页> 外文期刊>Economics >ECONOMIC REFORMS IN DEVELOPING AND TRANSFORMATION COUNTRIES: INCENTIVE PROBLEMS, CREDIBILITY DEFICITS, AND THE PROSPECTS OF SUCCESS OF COMPREHENSIVE REFORMS
【24h】

ECONOMIC REFORMS IN DEVELOPING AND TRANSFORMATION COUNTRIES: INCENTIVE PROBLEMS, CREDIBILITY DEFICITS, AND THE PROSPECTS OF SUCCESS OF COMPREHENSIVE REFORMS

机译:发展中和转型国家的经济改革:诱人的问题,可信赖的缺陷以及全面改革的成功前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The transformation countries of Central and East Europe have from the start vehemently resisted comparisons of their efforts towards and experience with reforms with the - partly successful, partly failed - reforms in developing countries. Indisputably, the starting conditions in these two groups of countries were greatly different. In particular the fact that market related institutions at the commencement of the transformation were largely lacking, and that the post-socialist economies were dominated by inefficient state enterprises, increased the complexity of programmes for economic policy reform in Eastern and Central Europe by comparison with the tasks facing developing countries during the 1970s and 1980s. In many cases, however, there was the danger of throwing out the baby with the bathwater, inasmuch as those responsible in the former countries declined to recognise the similarities that exist despite all the differences, and flatly denied that the experience of developing countries had any relevance. Analyses by the Kiel Institute of World Economics, for instance, have shown that the danger of the failure of reforms and the extent of the costs of adjustment are dependent in both developing and transformation countries on the timing andsequencing of reforms. In both cases, what is required is to set in motion a critical mass of reforms, to effectively tighten the budget restrictions of the economic actors, and to avoid essential inconsistencies. These requirements can - as the analyses show - best be satisfied in both groups of countries by reforms as comprehensive and rapidly carried out as possible.
机译:中欧和东欧的转型国家从一开始就坚决反对将他们为进行改革而付出的努力和经历与发展中国家(部分成功,部分失败)的改革进行比较。毋庸置疑,这两组国家的起跑条件大不相同。特别是,在改革开始之初就缺乏与市场有关的机构,后社会主义经济体由效率低下的国有企业主导,这一事实使东欧和中欧的经济政策改革计划与之相比更加复杂。 1970年代和1980年代发展中国家面临的任务。然而,在许多情况下,存在着将婴儿带洗澡水扔掉的危险,因为前国家的负责人尽管存在所有差异,但仍不承认存在的相似之处,并断然否认发展中国家的经验关联。例如,基尔世界经济研究所的分析表明,改革失败的风险和调整成本的程度,在发展中国家和转型国家都取决于改革的时间和顺序。在这两种情况下,都需要启动关键的改革措施,以有效收紧经济参与者的预算限制,并避免本质上的矛盾。正如分析所表明的那样,通过尽可能全面和迅速地进行改革,可以最好地满足这两组国家的这些要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号