...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecography >Using rarity to infer how dendritic network structure shapes biodiversity in riverine communities
【24h】

Using rarity to infer how dendritic network structure shapes biodiversity in riverine communities

机译:利用稀有性推断树突网络结构如何塑造河流社区的生物多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Dispersal of organisms connects physical localities, but the strength of connection varies widely. Variability in the infl uence of dispersal can be predictable in sharply defined networks like river systems because some sections of the network are more isolated, leading to different balances of local (i.e. environmental filtering, species interactions) and regional (i.e. dispersaldriven) processes in structuring communities. We examined the infl uence of spatial isolation on the relative contributions of α - and β -diversity to regional (γ) diversity, and examined how that infl uence differed between common and rare species in stream macroinvertebrate communities. One explanation for rarity on a regional scale is that common species are habitat generalists while rare species are specialists. Therefore, common species should be infl uenced more by dispersal-driven processes while rare species should be more infl uenced by local processes. We predicted that for rare taxa, β -diversity should represent a higher fraction of γ -diversity in isolated headwaters but that differences between rare and common taxa with regard to the contribution of β -diversity to γ -diversity should be less distinct in well-connected mainstem habitats. To test these predictions, we used macroinvertebrate communities from 634 sites across 22 watersheds. Regardless of rarity, β - and γ -diversity were higher in headwaters compared to mainstems. However, α -diversity was similar regardless of isolation for rare assemblages. But contrary to our predictions, common assemblages of predators and herbivores did exhibit differences in α -diversity between locations. Our predictions were strongly supported for two guilds of consumers, the detritivores and collectors, but less so for herbivores and predators. However, these results make sense considering differences in life histories between the groups. For detritivores and collectors, species turnover (β -diversity) was higher in isolated regions in river networks, and rarity exacerbated this effect, resulting in higher regional diversity of rare species, supporting the general theory that rarity refl ects habitat specialization.
机译:生物的扩散将物理位置连接起来,但是连接的强度差异很大。在像河系这样的清晰定义的网络中,扩散影响的可变性是可以预测的,因为网络的某些部分更加孤立,导致结构化过程中局部(即环境过滤,物种相互作用)和区域性(即由扩散驱动)过程的不同平衡社区。我们研究了空间隔离对α-和β-多样性对区域(γ)多样性的相对贡献的影响,并研究了该流在大型无脊椎动物群落中常见物种和稀有物种之间的差异。在区域范围内稀有性的一种解释是,普通物种是栖息地的通才,而稀有物种是专家。因此,普通物种应受到分散驱动过程的更多影响,而稀有物种应受到局部过程的更多影响。我们预测,对于稀有生物分类群,β-多样性应在离水源地中占较高比例的γ-多样性,但是稀有和普通分类群之间在β-多样性对γ-多样性的贡献方面的差异应在井眼中不那么明显。连接的主干栖息地。为了检验这些预测,我们使用了来自22个流域的634个地点的大型无脊椎动物群落。不论稀有度,源水的β-和γ-多样性均高于主要水体。但是,无论稀有集合如何孤立,α-多样性都是相似的。但是与我们的预测相反,食肉动物和食草动物的常见组合确实表现出不同地点之间α多样性的差异。我们的预测得到了两个行业协会的支持,即杀虫剂和捕食者,而食草动物和捕食者则不那么支持。然而,考虑到两组之间生活史的差异,这些结果是有意义的。对于有害生物和采集者,河网中偏远地区的物种更新(β-多样性)更高,稀有性加剧了这种影响,导致稀有物种的区域多样性更高,支持了稀有性反映栖息地专业化的一般理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号