【24h】

Lab History Reflections

机译:实验室历史的几点思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After a productive start in the 1980s, laboratory history is now surprisingly neglected-not lab science, but the lab as social institution. To restart interest, I suggest that we see labs as period specific (early modern, modern, postmodern) and of a piece with each era's dominant social institutions and practices. In the modern era, for example, labs have become powerful and ubiquitous because their operating principles are those of the nation-state and its consumerist political economy. Their educational function is crucial: labs have authority because they are an effective vehicle for educating en masse for life in modern states; they provide general entry to careers in scores of disciplines and a thousand occupations; and they embody prevailing ideals of a meritocracy of competence, transparency (through publication), and a universalistic logic of objectivity. An older microhistory of laboratory practices may thus be reborn as a systematic, macrosocial history of the lab.
机译:在1980年代取得了丰硕的成果之后,实验室的历史如今被意外地忽略了,不是实验室科学,而是实验室作为社会机构。为了重新引起人们的兴趣,我建议我们将实验室视为特定时期的(早期,现代,后现代),并与每个时代的主导社会制度和实践相结合。例如,在现代时代,实验室已经变得强大而无处不在,因为它们的操作原理是民族国家及其消费者主义政治经济学的原理。它们的教育功能至关重要:实验室之所以具有权威性,是因为它们是现代国家进行大规模终身教育的有效手段;它们为数十种学科和上千种职业提供了一般的职业进入途径;它们体现了胜任能力,透明度(通过出版)和客观性的普遍逻辑的普遍理想。因此,较旧的实验室实践微观历史可能会重生为实验室的系统的宏观社会历史。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号