首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Restricted Voices in the New Zealand GM Debate: An Analysis of New Zealand Metropolitan Newspaper Coverage (1998 to February 2002)
【24h】

Restricted Voices in the New Zealand GM Debate: An Analysis of New Zealand Metropolitan Newspaper Coverage (1998 to February 2002)

机译:新西兰通用汽车辩论中的声音受限:对新西兰大都市报纸报道的分析(1998年至2002年2月)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The discovery of genetically modified (GM) food in New Zealand in 1998 prompted a highly politicized debate about GM or biotechnology. In response, the government established a Royal Commission on Genetic Modification in May 2000. The Royal Commission and public opposition to GM, evident in large public protests, made the issue highly newsworthy. For many people the news media represent their main source of information on GM and the issues surrounding it. The news media are able to influence the public agenda by making some issues more salient in the minds of the public. Moreover, by highlighting certain attributes, the news media can suggest the most important aspects of these issues. Given the concern surrounding GM and its potential importance to the New Zealand economy, it is important to understand how the New Zealand press framed the GM debate. A content analysis of metropolitan newspaper reportage of the GM debate between 1998 and 2002 revealed that readers were offered a very narrow range of frames by which they could judge the issue and that some newspapers underrepresented some groups and their viewpoints. The results bring into question the ability of the press to act as a facilitator of public debate about GM and similar issues in the future.
机译:1998年在新西兰发现了转基因食品,引发了有关转基因或生物技术的高度政治化的辩论。作为回应,政府于2000年5月成立了皇家基因改造委员会。皇家委员会和公众对转基因的反对意见在大规模的公众抗议中都显而易见,这使该问题极具新闻价值。对于许多人来说,新闻媒体代表了他们关于转基因及其相关问题的主要信息来源。新闻媒体能够通过使某些问题在公众心目中更加突出来影响公众议程。此外,通过强调某些属性,新闻媒体可以建议这些问题的最重要方面。考虑到围绕转基因的担忧及其对新西兰经济的潜在重要性,重要的是要了解新西兰媒体是如何安排转基因辩论的。对1998年至2002年之间的GM辩论大都会报纸报道进行的内容分析显示,向读者提供的框架范围很窄,可以用来判断问题,有些报纸代表的群体和观点不足。结果使人们质疑新闻界将来是否有能力促进有关通用汽车和类似问题的公开辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号