首页> 外文期刊>Irish Forestry >The impact of calibration on the accuracy of harvester measurement of total harvest volume and assortment volume for Sitka spruce clearfells in Ireland
【24h】

The impact of calibration on the accuracy of harvester measurement of total harvest volume and assortment volume for Sitka spruce clearfells in Ireland

机译:校准对爱尔兰Sitka云杉无花果收获机总收获量和分类量的准确度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Almost all timber in Ireland is felled using harvesters; the objective of the work reported here was to assess the impact of calibration on the accuracy of harvester wood volume measurement systems. The harvester used was a Timberjack 1270D with a 762C harvester head and a Timbermatic 300 control and measurement system. Harvester measurement was compared to weighbridge measurement (weight was converted into volume using volume-weight conversion factors) and to log volume, measured using standard calliper-and-tape log measurement. The first part of the study dealt with the accuracy of the harvester system in measuring total and assortment volumes for whole stands, when compared to weighbridge results. Regular calibration resulted in a significant improvement in accuracy, reducing differences between the two estimates, from 12% to around 6%. However, this compares with accuracy levels of +- 2% of total site volume, which have been achieved in Finland on an annual basis. The second part of the work comprised a more detailed analysis of the accuracy of the harvester system in measuring assortment volumes. Length measurement of four assortment categories was accurate after calibration, while the volume measurement was satisfactory for 5.50, 4.90 and 3.10 m lengths, but not for the 2.90 m category. Statistically significant differences in volume estimation were found for three assortment categories (4.90, 3.10 and 2.90 m). However, the differences between the harvester head and calliper-and-tape valueswere small (less than 30 mm and 0.007 m3 in all cases), so the operational significance of these findings might be limited.
机译:爱尔兰几乎所有木材都是使用收割机砍伐的;此处报告的工作目标是评估校准对收割机木材体积测量系统准确性的影响。使用的收割机是带有762C收割机头的Timberjack 1270D和Timbermatic 300控制和测量系统。将收割机的测量值与地磅测量值(使用体积-重量转换因子将重量转换为体积)进行比较,并与使用标准卡尺和带子对数测量法测量的对数体积进行比较。与称重结果相比,研究的第一部分涉及收获机系统在测量整个林分的总体积和分类体积时的准确性。定期校准可以显着提高准确度,从而将两个估算值之间的差异从12%减少到6%。但是,相比之下,芬兰每年实现的准确度为总场地容量的±2%。工作的第二部分包括对收割机系统在测量分类量中的准确性的更详细分析。校准后,四个分类类别的长度测量是准确的,而体积测量对于5.50、4.90和3.10m长度是令人满意的,但对于2.90m类别则不令人满意。发现三种分类类别(4.90、3.10和2.90 m)的体积估计量具有统计上的显着差异。但是,收割机头和卡尺和纸带值之间的差异很小(在所有情况下均小于30 mm和0.007 m3),因此这些发现的操作意义可能受到限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号