【24h】

On the co-creation of classical and modern physics

机译:论古典与现代物理学的共同创造

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While the concept of "classical physics" has long framed our understanding of the environment from which modem physics emerged, it has consistently been read back into a period in which the physicists concerned initially considered their work in quite other terms. This essay explores the shifting currency of the rich cultural image of the classical/ modem divide by tracing empirically different uses of "classical" within the physics community from the 1890s to 1911. A study of fin-de-siecle addresses shows that the earliest general uses of the concept proved controversial. Our present understanding of the term was in large part shaped by its incorporation (in different ways) within the emerging theories of relativity and quantum theory-where the content of "classical" physics was defined by proponents of the new. Studying the diverse ways in which Boltzmann, Larmor, Poincare, Einstein, Minkowski, and Planck invoked the term "classical" will help clarify the critical relations between physicists' research programs and their use of worldview arguments in fashioning modem physics.
机译:尽管“古典物理学”的概念长期以来一直使我们对现代物理学的产生环境有所了解,但一直以来,这种理解一直被追溯到有关物理学家最初以完全不同的方式考虑其工作的时期。本文通过追溯1890年代至1911年物理学界在经验上对“古典”的不同用法,探索了古典/现代鸿沟的丰富文化形象的货币变化。对鳍片式地址的研究表明,最早的通用该概念的使用引起争议。我们目前对该术语的理解很大程度上是由于它以(以不同方式)并入新兴的相对论和量子理论中而形成的,其中“经典”物理学的内容由新的支持者定义。研究玻尔兹曼,拉莫尔,庞加莱,爱因斯坦,明可夫斯基和普朗克援引“古典”一词的各种方式,将有助于澄清物理学家的研究计划与他们在建立现代物理学中使用世界观论点之间的关键关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号