...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Material Forming: Official Journal of the European Scientific Association for Material Forming - ESAFORM >Determination of the forming limit of impact hydroforming by frictionless full zone hydraulic forming test
【24h】

Determination of the forming limit of impact hydroforming by frictionless full zone hydraulic forming test

机译:通过无摩擦全区液压成形试验确定冲击液压成形的成形极限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is impossible to obtain the forming limit curve (FLC) by full zone hydraulic forming test under quasi-static (QS) condition since the liquid will leak from the notches of the specimen once the pressure increases. In this study, a novel method is proposed to investigate the frictionless full zone hydraulic FLC of AA5A06 under high strain rate (HSR) condition based on the impact hydroforming technology (IHF). It is found that the FLC is increased significantly by IHF compared with the quasi-static rigid punch (QS-R) forming and the quasi-static hydraulic (QS-H) forming. Differentiating with the QS-H, the increase amounts of FLC at the biaxial tension zone and the tension-compression zone are notably different for IHF. Additionally, the theoretical calculations of FLC is conducted by using M-K model combining with Hill48 anisotropic yield criterion under QS and HSR conditions. The results calculated by the M-K model reasonably agree with the ones obtained from experimentation under QS and HSR condition, and a higher initial thickness ratio is assigned for HSR considering the neck postponing effect of inertia.
机译:在准静态(QS)条件下,通过全区液压成形试验不可能获得成形极限曲线(FLC),因为一旦压力增加,液体就会从试样的槽口泄漏。本研究基于冲击液压成形技术(IHF)研究了AA5A06在高应变率(HSR)工况下的无摩擦全区水力FLC。研究发现,与准静态刚性冲头(QS-R)成形和准静态液压(QS-H)成形相比,IHF显著提高了FLC。与QS-H不同,IHF在双轴拉伸区和拉压区FLC的增加量明显不同。此外,在QS和HSR条件下,采用M-K模型结合Hill48各向异性产率准则对FLC进行了理论计算。M-K模型计算的结果与QS和HSR条件下的实验结果吻合较好,考虑到惯性的颈部延迟效应,为HSR分配了更高的初始厚度比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号