首页> 外文期刊>International journal on disability and human development : >Comparative study on the efficacy of electromyography arid galvanic skin resistance blofeedback In tension type headaches a single blinded randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparative study on the efficacy of electromyography arid galvanic skin resistance blofeedback In tension type headaches a single blinded randomized controlled trial

机译:肌电图和皮肤皮肤电刺激性反流在张力型头痛中的疗效比较研究单盲随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Tension type headache is the most widespread and most common primary headache disorder accounting for nearly 90% of all headaches. Efficacy of electromyography biofeedback in patients with tension type headache has been proven but efficacy of galvanic skin resistance biofeedback has not been studied adequately. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of electromyography biofeedback and galvanic skin resistance biofeedback in patients with tension type headache. Methods: We performed a randomized single blinded controlled study. Out of 116 recruited subjects, 91 (59 females and 32 males) were randomly assigned to three groups receiving electromyography biofeedback (n=30), galvanic skin resistance biofeedback (n=30), and a control group (n=31). Each subject (except the control group) received 15 biofeedback sessions for 30 min each in an isolated room. The control group received only medication prescribed by their physician. Each patient was blinded to the type of biofeedback being given. Pain variables, SF-36 quality of life scores, and analgesic usage were recorded at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after therapy. Results: There was a significant difference in frequency and duration of headache in electromyography and galvanic skin resistance groups (p<0.01), whereas the control group showed significant differences in intensity (p=0.05) and duration (p<0.001). Significant improvement was seen only in total SF-36 scores after 1 year in the electromyography and control groups (p=0.03 and p=0.00, respectively). A significant drop in analgesic usage was seen in all groups at 1 year (p<0.001).Conclusions: Electromyography and galvanic skin resistance biofeedback are effective in the treatment of tension type headache, with electromyography biofeedback being more effective than galvanic skin resistance biofeedback.
机译:背景:紧张型头痛是最普遍,最常见的原发性头痛疾病,占所有头痛的近90%。肌电生物反馈对紧张型头痛患者的疗效已得到证实,但对皮肤皮肤电生物反馈的有效性尚未进行充分研究。本研究的目的是比较肌电生物反馈和皮肤电抗生物反馈在紧张型头痛患者中的疗效。方法:我们进行了一项随机单盲对照研究。在116名新招募的受试者中,将91名女性(59名女性和32名男性)随机分为三组,分别接受肌电图生物反馈(n = 30),皮肤电阻力生物反馈(n = 30)和对照组(n = 31)。每个受试者(对照组除外)在一个隔离的房间中接受15次生物反馈,每次30分钟。对照组仅接受医生处方的药物。每位患者都不知道所给予的生物反馈类型。在治疗后的基线,1个月,6个月和1年记录疼痛变量,SF-36生活质量评分和止痛药的使用。结果:肌电图和皮肤电刺激组的头痛发生频率和持续时间有显着差异(p <0.01),而对照组的强度和持续时间则有显着差异(p = 0.05)。肌电图检查组和对照组仅在1年后的总SF-36评分中看到了显着改善(分别为p = 0.03和p = 0.00)。在1年时,所有组的镇痛剂使用量均显着下降(p <0.001)。结论:肌电图和皮肤电生物反馈对紧张型头痛有效,肌电生物反馈比电皮肤生物反馈更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号