首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >Measurement of hepatic perfusion with dynamic computed tomography: assessment of normal values and comparison of two methods to compensate for motion artifacts.
【24h】

Measurement of hepatic perfusion with dynamic computed tomography: assessment of normal values and comparison of two methods to compensate for motion artifacts.

机译:用动态计算机断层摄影术测量肝血流灌注:评估正常值并比较两种补偿运动伪影的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess normal values of hepatic perfusion by dynamic, single-section computed tomography, to compare two methods of data processing (a smoothing with a fitting procedure), and to evaluate the influence of motion artifacts. METHODS: Twenty-five volunteers with no history or suspicion of liver disease were examined (age range, 32.8-81.1 years). All examinations were subjectively ranked into groups 1 through 3 according to the degree of motion artifacts (negligible, moderate, severe). All data were processed with a smoothing procedure and a pharmacokinetic fitting procedure (TopFit). The arterial, portal venous, and total hepatic perfusion; the hepatic perfusion index (HPI); and the arterial/portal venous ratio (A/P ratio) were calculated with both procedures. RESULTS: Mean hepatic perfusion, as assessed with the fitting procedure and the smoothing procedure, respectively, was as follows: arterial, 0.20 and 0.22 mL x min(-1) x mL(-1); portal venous, 1.02 and 1.24 mL x min(-1) x mL(-1); total perfusion, 1.22 and 1.47 mL x min(-1) x mL(-1); HPI, 16.4% and 15.4%; and A/P ratio, 0.20 and 0.19. The differences were significant for the portal venous and total hepatic perfusion. The portal venous and total hepatic perfusion values showed significant differences between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 for both procedures. HPI and the A/P ratio showed no significant differences at all. CONCLUSIONS: Motion artifacts and the type of data processing influence the assessment of the arterial, portal venous, and total hepatic perfusion but do not influence measurement of the HPI and the A/P ratio.
机译:理由和目的:通过动态单节计算机体层摄影术评估肝灌注的正常值,比较两种数据处理方法(采用拟合过程进行平滑处理),并评估运动伪影的影响。方法:检查了25名无肝病病史或怀疑肝病的志愿者(年龄32.8-81.1岁)。根据运动伪影的程度(可忽略,中等,严重),将所有检查主观分为1至3组。所有数据均使用平滑程序和药代动力学拟合程序(TopFit)处理。动脉,门静脉和总肝灌注;肝灌注指数(HPI);并用这两种方法计算动脉/门静脉比率(A / P比率)。结果:分别通过拟合程序和平滑程序评估的平均肝灌注如下:动脉,0.20和0.22 mL x min(-1)x mL(-1);门静脉,1.02和1.24 mL x min(-1)x mL(-1);总灌注为1.22和1.47 mL x min(-1)x mL(-1); HPI,16.4%和15.4%; A / P比分别为0.20和0.19。对于门静脉和总肝灌注,差异是显着的。对于这两种方法,第1组与第2组和第3组之间的门静脉和总肝灌注值均显示出显着差异。 HPI和A / P比完全没有显着差异。结论:运动伪影和数据处理类型影响对动脉,门静脉和总肝灌注的评估,但不影响HPI和A / P比的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号