...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >Automated short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance image acquisitions: accuracy of left ventricular dimension measurements in normal subjects and patients.
【24h】

Automated short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance image acquisitions: accuracy of left ventricular dimension measurements in normal subjects and patients.

机译:自动化短轴心脏磁共振图像采集:正常受试者和患者左心室尺寸测量的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE:: This study investigates the use of an automated observer-independent planning system for short-axis cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) acquisitions in the clinical environment. The capacity of the automated method to produce accurate measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function was quantitatively assessed in normal subjects and patients. METHODS:: Fourteen healthy volunteers and 8 patients underwent cardiovascular MR (CMR) acquisitions for ventricular function assessment. Short-axis datasets of the left ventricle (LV) were acquired in 2 ways: manually planned and generated in an automatic fashion. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were derived from the 2 datasets. The agreement between the manual and automatic planning methods was assessed. RESULTS:: The mean differences between the manual and automated CMR planning methods for the normal subjects and patients were 5.89 mL and 1.93 mL (EDV), 1.14 mL and -0.41 mL (ESV), 0.81% and 0.89% (EF), and 4.35 g and 3.88 g (LVM), respectively. There was no significant difference in ESV and EF. LVM significantly differed in both groups, whereas EDV was significantly different in the normal subjects and insignificantly different in the patients. The variability coefficients were 2.8 and 3.59 (EDV), 3.3 and 5.03 (ESV), 1.79 and 2.65 (EF), and 4.36 and 2.27 (LVM) for the normal subjects and patients, respectively. The mean angular deviation of the LV axes turned out to be 8.58 +/- 5.76 degrees for the normal subjects and 8.35 +/- 5.15 degrees for the patients. CONCLUSIONS:: Automated CMR planning method can provide accurate measurements of LV dimensions in normal subjects and patients, and therefore, can be used in the clinical environment for functional assessment of the human cardiovascular system.
机译:理由和目的::这项研究调查了在临床环境中使用自动化的独立于观察者的计划系统进行短轴心血管磁共振(MR)采集的情况。在正常受试者和患者中定量评估了自动方法产生左心室尺寸和功能的准确测量值的能力。方法:14名健康志愿者和8名患者接受了心血管MR(CMR)采集以评估心室功能。左心室(LV)的短轴数据集以两种方式获取:手动计划并以自动方式生成。舒张末期容积(EDV),收缩末期容积(ESV),射血分数(EF)和左心室重量(LVM)从这两个数据集中得出。评估了手动和自动计划方法之间的一致性。结果:正常受试者和患者的手动和自动CMR计划方法之间的平均差异为5.89 mL和1.93 mL(EDV),1.14 mL和-0.41 mL(ESV),0.81%和0.89%(EF),以及分别为4.35 g和3.88 g(LVM)。 ESV和EF没有显着差异。两组的LVM显着不同,而正常受试者的EDV显着不同,而患者则无明显差异。正常受试者和患者的变异系数分别为2.8和3.59(EDV),3.3和5.03(ESV),1.79和2.65(EF),4.36和2.27(LVM)。 LV轴的平均角度偏差对于正常受试者是8.58 +/- 5.76度,对于患者是8.35 +/- 5.15度。结论:自动化的CMR计划方法可以提供正常受试者和患者左心室尺寸的准确测量值,因此可以在临床环境中用于人体心血管系统的功能评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号