...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >Therapy monitoring of magnetic resonance-guided radiofrequency ablation using T1and T2-weighted sequences at 1.5 T: Reliability of estimated ablation zones
【24h】

Therapy monitoring of magnetic resonance-guided radiofrequency ablation using T1and T2-weighted sequences at 1.5 T: Reliability of estimated ablation zones

机译:使用T1和T2加权序列在1.5 T时进行磁共振引导的射频消融的治疗监测:估计的消融区域的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the size and shape of the indicated ablation zone using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with different contrast weightings after MR-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) at 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance images of 50 patients treated for hepatic malignancies using MR-guided RFA were retrospectively evaluated. Areas indicating ablation zones in contrast-enhanced images were compared with nonenhanced T1and T2-weighted images acquired after the intervention and 1 and 7 months after therapy. Corresponding slices were selected and registered to each other. Regions indicating ablation zones were segmented and compared. Areas in cm, positive predictive value, and sensitivity of native T1and T2-weighted images were calculated with regard to their accordance with the contrast-enhanced images. RESULTS: Directly after the intervention, the ratios between the areas of the ablation zone in the contrast-enhanced and the tested sequences were 1.02 ± 0.12 in the T1-weighted images and 2.03 ± 0.78 in the T2-weighted images. Sensitivity (portion of the coagulation zone that was correctly detected based on the tested sequences) was 0.88 ± 0.08 using the T1-weighted and 0.54 ± 0.20 using the T2-weighted images. The positive predictive values were 0.89 ± 0.06 (T1 weighted) and 0.93 ± 0.06 (T2 weighted). One month after therapy, the ratios between the areas in the contrast-enhanced and the tested sequences were 1.02 ± 0.12 in the T1-weighted images and 1.04 ± 0.25 in the T2-weighted images. Seven months after therapy, the ratios were 1.04 ± 0.16 in the T1-weighted and 1.18 ± 0.22 in the T2-weighted images. CONCLUSION: In examinations performed directly after the intervention, the T2-weighted images tend to underestimate the ablation zone, whereas T1-weighted images clearly better reflect the ablation zone. T1-weighted images therefore seem more adequate for repetitive monitoring of MR-guided RFA at 1.5 T.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较在1.5 T MR引导的射频消融(RFA)后使用具有不同对比度权重的磁共振(MR)成像比较指定消融区的大小和形状。材料和方法:磁共振图像回顾性评估了50例接受MR引导的RFA治疗的肝恶性肿瘤的患者。将对比增强图像中指示消融区的区域与干预后以及治疗后1和7个月获得的未增强T1和T2加权图像进行比较。选择相应的切片并相互注册。分割并比较指示消融区的区域。根据与对比度增强的图像相一致的方式,计算以厘米为单位的面积,正的预测值以及原始T1和T2加权图像的灵敏度。结果:在干预后,对比增强序列和测试序列的消融区面积比在T1加权图像中分别为1.02±0.12和T2加权图像中为2.03±0.78。灵敏度(基于测试序列正确检测到的凝结区部分)使用T1加权图像为0.88±0.08,使用T2加权图像为0.54±0.20。阳性预测值为0.89±0.06(T1加权)和0.93±0.06(T2加权)。治疗一个月后,在T1加权图像中,对比增强序列和测试序列的面积比为1.02±0.12,在T2加权图像中为1.04±0.25。治疗七个月后,T1加权图像的比率为1.04±0.16,T2加权图像的比率为1.18±0.22。结论:在干预后直接进行的检查中,T2加权图像往往低估了消融区域,而T1加权图像显然更好地反映了消融区域。因此,T1加权图像似乎更适合在1.5 T时重复监测MR引导的RFA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号