首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers.
【24h】

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers.

机译:颞下颌关节的高分辨率磁共振成像:志愿者在1.5和3.0 Tesla下的图像质量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the image quality of a high-resolution imaging protocol for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) at 3.0 T and to compare it with our standard 1.5 T protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen volunteers without history of TMJ dysfunction underwent bilateral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the TMJ with the jaw in closed and open position. MRI was performed with using a 1.5 T (standard TMJ coil) and 3.0 T (purpose build phased array coil) MR system (Gyroscan Intera 1.5 T and 3.0 T; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Imaging protocols consisted of a parasagittal PDw-TSE sequence and a coronal PDw-TSE sequence in closed mouth position and a sagittal PDw-TSE sequence in open mouth position. Acquisition parameters were adjusted for 3.0 T and voxel size was reduced from 0.29 x 0.29 x 3.0 mm (1.5 T) to 0.15 x 0.15 x 1.5 mm (3.0 T). Total examination time (15 minutes) was similar for both systems. Two observers assessed in consensus delineation, image quality, and artifacts of anatomic landmarks (disk, bilaminar zone, capsular attachment, cortical bone) and ranked them qualitatively on a 5-point scale from 1 (optimal) to 5 (nondiagnostic). Disk position and motility was noted. For CNR analysis, signal intensity from disk and retrodiscal tissue was measured. RESULTS: Disk position and mobility was identical at both field strengths. All anatomic landmarks were visualized significantly better at 3.0 T. In particular, the capsular attachment was depicted in more detail. Overall image quality was ranked significantly higher at 3.0 T, whereas artifact score was similar. Quantitative evaluation showed significantly higher CNR for 3.0 T (10.23 vs. 8.08, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Depiction of the normal anatomy of the TMJ benefits significantly when investing the higher SNR at 3.0 T into better spatial resolution. We anticipate that this advantage of 3.0 T MRI will also permit a more detailed analysis of capsular and disk pathology.
机译:目的:评估颞下颌关节(TMJ)在3.0 T时的高分辨率成像协议的图像质量,并将其与我们的标准1.5 T协议进行比较。材料与方法:15名无TMJ功能障碍病史的志愿者在颌骨处于闭合和打开位置时接受了TMJ的双侧磁共振成像(MRI)。使用1.5 T(标准TMJ线圈)和3.0 T(专用构建相控阵线圈)MR系统(Gyroscan Intera 1.5 T和3.0 T; Philips Medical Systems,Best,荷兰)进行MRI。成像方案由在闭口位置的矢状位PDw-TSE序列和冠状PDw-TSE序列以及在张口位置的矢状位PDw-TSE序列组成。将采集参数调整为3.0 T,并将体素大小从0.29 x 0.29 x 3.0 mm(1.5 T)减小到0.15 x 0.15 x 1.5 mm(3.0 T)。两种系统的总检查时间(15分钟)相似。两名观察员对共识标志,图像质量和解剖标志物(椎间盘,胆管区,囊膜附件,皮质骨)的伪影进行了评估,并定性地将其定性为5分(从1(最佳)到5(非诊断性))。注意到椎间盘的位置和运动。为了进行CNR分析,测量了来自椎间盘和除垢后组织的信号强度。结果:在两个场强下,盘的位置和移动性都相同。在3.0 T时,所有解剖标志物的视觉效果均显着提高。特别是,更详细地描述了囊状附件。总体图像质量在3.0 T时排名较高,而伪影得分相似。定量评估显示3.0 T的CNR明显更高(10.23 vs. 8.08,P <0.0001)。结论:将3.0 T时的较高SNR投资于更好的空间分辨率时,描绘TMJ的正常解剖结构将大有裨益。我们预计3.0 T MRI的这一优势还将允许对包膜和磁盘病理进行更详细的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号