...
首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >TVT-O vs. TVT for the treatment of SUI: a non-inferiority study.
【24h】

TVT-O vs. TVT for the treatment of SUI: a non-inferiority study.

机译:TVT-O与TVT的SUI治疗:一项非自卑性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to prospectively compare, in terms of efficacy and safety, the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and the transobturator vaginal tape inside-out (TVT-O) procedure for stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: A cough stress test was applied to the objective outcomes, while urinary incontinence-specific quality of life questionnaire was applied to the subjective outcomes. A test for non-inferiority was carried out for detecting the success rate between the two groups. RESULTS: The objective success rates were found to be 95.4% (62/65) in the TVT group and 96.4% (108/112) in the TVT-O group. No significant difference was found between these two groups in the success rate by non-inferiority test (P < 0.0005), with significant improvement in quality of life and no significant difference in patient satisfaction rates in the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the study, the TVT-O procedure could be defined to be identical to the TVT approach in success rate by non-inferiority test.
机译:引言和假设:本研究旨在就有效性和安全性对压力性尿失禁的无张力阴道胶带(TVT)和经闭孔阴道胶带内向外(TVT-O)程序进行前瞻性比较。方法:将咳嗽压力测试用于客观结果,而将针对尿失禁的生活质量问卷用于主观结果。进行非自卑性测试以检测两组之间的成功率。结果:TVT组的客观成功率为95.4%(62/65),TVT-O组的客观成功率为96.4%(108/112)。通过非劣效性测试,两组的成功率无显着差异(P <0.0005),生活质量显着改善,两组患者的满意度也无显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论:在这项研究中,可以通过非劣效性测试将TVT-O程序定义为与TVT方法的成功率相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号