首页> 外文期刊>International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction >Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?
【24h】

Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?

机译:标准化的sa棘韧带固定术对居民而言是一种安全的教学程序吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Several modifications of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SLF) are described. METHODS: This study presents a standardised SLF technique. Perioperative course and outcome are compared retrospectively after surgery is performed by experienced surgeons or by residents. RESULTS: Two hundred three SLF were analysed. Eight residents (LO) operated on 41 patients (5.1 +/- 2.2). Six experienced surgeons (SO) operated on 162 patients (27.0 +/- 25.7). Mean operating time was 67 +/- 33 min. (LO 99 +/- 45 min vs. SO 59 +/- 22 min, p < 0.05). The overall morbidity rate was 7.8%. There was no significant difference regarding complications and outcomes between SO and LO. CONCLUSIONS: Operation time was longer but outcomes were identical, and morbidity rate was not increased in the group of resident surgeons. In comparison to literature, complication rate was low. SLF should be part of residency programmes.
机译:引言和假设:描述了s棘韧带固定(SLF)的几种修改。方法:本研究提出了一种标准化的SLF技术。由经验丰富的外科医生或住院医师对手术后的围手术期和结局进行回顾性比较。结果:分析了203个SLF。八名居民(LO)对41例患者进行了手术(5.1 +/- 2.2)。六位经验丰富的外科医生(SO)对162例患者进行了手术(27.0 +/- 25.7)。平均操作时间为67 +/- 33分钟。 (LO 99 +/- 45分钟与SO 59 +/- 22分钟,p <0.05)。总体发病率为7.8%。 SO和LO之间在并发症和预后方面无显着差异。结论:住院医师组手术时间更长,但结局相同,发病率没有增加。与文献相比,并发症发生率低。 SLF应该是居住计划的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号