首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Screening for autism in pre-school children in primary care: systematic review of English Language tools.
【24h】

Screening for autism in pre-school children in primary care: systematic review of English Language tools.

机译:筛查学龄前儿童在初级保健中的自闭症:对英语工具的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To review the accuracy of brief screening tools for autism in pre-school children. DESIGN: Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Psychlit plus references of identified papers and contact with authors. SUBJECTS: Children and infants aged 5 years or less without a prior diagnosis of autism or pervasive development delay. INTERVENTIONS: Tools/checklists appropriate for use in screening for autism in primary care settings. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of screening tools and likelihood ratios relative to a diagnostic assessment made using either DSM-III/IV or ICD 10 diagnosis. RESULTS: Three studies considering two tools were identified. The CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (CHAT) was tested on an appropriate population sample with moderate long-term follow-up but demonstrated poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. Weaker evidence suggested that the Modified CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) had high sensitivity but follow-up was of shorter term and less comprehensive. CONCLUSIONS: The CHAT demonstrated a level of sensitivity unlikely to be useful for population screening purposes, however, its high specificity suggests it has utility in secondary screening. The M-CHAT is a parent only report and might be more sensitive, and therefore appropriate for population screening. However, full conclusions regarding its accuracy cannot be drawn until follow-up data has been collected.
机译:目的:回顾学龄前儿童自闭症简易筛查工具的准确性。设计:对诊断准确性研究的系统评价。数据来源:Medline,Embase,Cinahl和Psychlit,以及已鉴定论文的参考文献和与作者联系。受试者:5岁以下的儿童和婴儿,没有事先诊断出自闭症或普遍性发育延迟。干预措施:适用于在初级保健机构中筛查自闭症的工具/清单。观察指标:相对于使用DSM-III / IV或ICD 10诊断进行的诊断评估,筛查工具的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值以及似然比。结果:确定了三项研究,其中考虑了两种工具。对儿童自闭症检查表(CHAT)进行了适当的人群样本测试,并进行了长期的中度随访,但显示出较差的敏感性和积极的预测价值。较弱的证据表明,《改良型幼儿自闭症检查表》(M-CHAT)具有较高的敏感性,但随访时间较短,且综合性较差。结论:CHAT的敏感性水平不太可能用于人群筛查,但是其高特异性表明它可用于二次筛查。 M-CHAT是仅父母的报告,可能更敏感,因此适合进行人群筛查。但是,只有在收集到后续数据之后才能得出有关其准确性的完整结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号