...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Inter-professional differences in compliance with standard precautions in operating theatres: A multi-site, mixed methods study
【24h】

Inter-professional differences in compliance with standard precautions in operating theatres: A multi-site, mixed methods study

机译:专业人士在手术室中遵守标准预防措施的差异:多场所混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Occupational acquisition of blood-borne infections has been reported following exposure to blood or body fluids. Consistent adherence to standard precautions will reduce the risk of infection. Objectives: To identify: the frequency of self-reported adverse exposure to blood and body fluids among surgeons and scrub nurses during surgical procedures; contributory factors to such injuries; the extent of compliance with standard precautions; and factors influencing compliance with precautions. Design: A multi-site mixed methods study incorporating a cross-sectional survey and interviews. Settings: Six NHS trusts in Wales between January 2006 and August 2008. Participants: Surgeons and scrub nurses and Senior Infection Control Nurses. Methods: A postal survey to all surgeons and scrub nurses, who engaged in exposure prone procedures, followed by face to face interviews with surgeons and scrub nurses, and telephone interviews with Infection Control Nurses. Results: Response rate was 51.47% (315/612). Most 219/315 (69.5%) respondents reported sustaining an inoculation injury in the last five years: 183/315 (58.1%) reported sharps' injuries and 40/315 (12.7%) splashes. Being a surgeon and believing injuries to be an occupational hazard were significantly associated with increased risk of sharps' injuries (adjusted odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.88 and adjusted odds ratio 2.0, 1.11-3.5, respectively). Compliance was incomplete: 31/315 (10%) respondents always complied with all available precautions, 1/315 (0.003%) claimed never to comply with any precautions; 64/293 (21.8%) always used safety devices, 141/310 (45.5%) eye protection, 72 (23.2%) double gloves, and 259/307 (84.4%) avoided passing sharps from hand to hand. Others selected precautions according to their own assessment of risk. Surgeons were less likely to adopt eye protection (adjusted odds ratio 0.28, 0.11-0.71) and to attend training sessions (odds ratio 0.111, 0.061-0.19). The professions viewed the risks associated with their roles differently, with nurses being more willing to follow protocols. Conclusion: Inter-professional differences in experiencing adverse exposures must be addressed to improve safety and reduce infection risks. This requires new training initiatives to alter risk perception and promote compliance with policies and procedures.
机译:背景:据报道,接触血液或体液后会获得职业性血源性感染。始终遵守标准预防措施将降低感染风险。目的:确定:外科医生和擦洗护士在手术过程中自我报告的血液和体液不良接触的频率;造成此类伤害的因素;遵守标准预防措施的程度;和影响遵守预防措施的因素。设计:多站点混合方法研究,其中包括横断面调查和访谈。地点:2006年1月至2008年8月之间,威尔士拥有6个NHS信托。参加者:外科医生和磨砂护士以及高级感染控制护士。方法:对所有易于暴露的外科医生和擦洗护士进行邮政调查,然后与外科医生和擦洗护士进行面对面访谈,并与感染控制护士进行电话访谈。结果:回应率为51.47%(315/612)。大多数219/315(69.5%)的受访者表示在过去五年中遭受了接种伤害:183/315(58.1%)的人称锐器受伤,有40/315(12.7%)的飞溅。作为外科医生并认为伤害是职业危害与锐器受伤的风险增加显着相关(调整后的优势比分别为1.73、95%置信区间1.04-2.88和调整后的优势比为2.0、1.11-3.5)。遵从性不完整:31/315(10%)的被调查者始终遵守所有可用的预防措施,1/315(0.003%)声称从未遵守任何预防措施;始终使用64/293(21.8%)的安全保护装置,141/310(45.5%)的眼睛保护装置,72(23.2%)的双指手套和259/307(84.4%)的避免使用尖锐物。其他人则根据自己对风险的评估来选择预防措施。外科医生不太可能采取眼睛保护措施(调整后的优势比为0.28,0.11-0.71),也不太可能参加培训课程(优势比为0.111,0.061-0.19)。专业人士从不同角度看待与角色相关的风险,护士更愿意遵循规程。结论:必须解决职业接触不良情况之间的差异,以提高安全性并降低感染风险。这就需要新的培训计划来改变对风险的认识并促进对政策和程序的遵守。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号