...
首页> 外文期刊>International psychogeriatrics >Clock drawing test - screening utility for mild cognitive impairment according to different scoring systems: results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+).
【24h】

Clock drawing test - screening utility for mild cognitive impairment according to different scoring systems: results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+).

机译:时钟绘图测试-根据不同的评分系统筛选轻度认知障碍的工具:莱比锡老年人研究(LEILA 75+)的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is a strong demand for screening instruments for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as a pre-stage of dementia. The clock drawing test (CDT) is widely used to screen for dementia, but the utility in screening for MCI remains uncertain. In particular, it is still questionable which scoring system is the best in order to screen for MCI. We therefore aimed to compare the utility of different CDT scoring systems for screening for MCI. METHODS: In a sample of 428 subjects of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+) study, CDT scores of different scoring systems were compared between subjects with and without MCI. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC; area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity) was performed and inter-rater reliability was calculated. RESULTS: The CDT scores differed significantly between MCI and non-MCI subjects according to all scoring systems applied. However, ROC of the CDT scores was not adequate. CONCLUSIONS: None of the present CDT scoring systems has sufficient utility to screen reliably for MCI. The clinical value of the CDT could be improved by using semi-quantitative scoring, having a wider score range and focusing on specific details of the clock (e.g. the hands and numbers).
机译:背景:作为痴呆症的早期阶段,对轻度认知障碍(MCI)筛查仪器的需求很大。时钟绘图测试(CDT)被广泛用于筛查痴呆症,但筛查MCI的效用仍不确定。尤其是,要筛选MCI,哪种评分系统是最好的仍然值得怀疑。因此,我们旨在比较不同CDT评分系统用于MCI筛选的效用。方法:在428名莱比锡老年人纵向研究(LEILA 75+)研究的样本中,比较了有无MCI的受试者在不同评分系统上的CDT得分。比较接收器的工作特性(ROC;曲线下的面积,灵敏度,特异性),并计算评估者之间的可靠性。结果:根据所应用的所有评分系统,MCI和非MCI受试者的CDT得分差异显着。但是,CDT分数的ROC不足。结论:目前的CDT评分系统都没有足够的工具来可靠地筛查MCI。 CDT的临床价值可以通过使用半定量评分,更宽的评分范围以及关注时钟的特定细节(例如指针和数字)来提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号