首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis.
【24h】

The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis.

机译:2000年至2006年间在高影响力护理期刊上发表的研究证据:定量内容分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice has become an imperative for efficient, effective and safe practice. Furthermore, evidences emerging from published research are considered as valid knowledge sources to guiding practice. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to review all research articles published in the top 10 general nursing journals for the years 2000-2006 to identify the methodologies used, the types of evidence these studies produced and the issues upon which they endeavored. DESIGN: Quantitative content analysis was implemented to study all published research papers of the top 10 general nursing journals for the years 2000-2006. METHODS: The top 10 general nursing journals were included in the study. The abstracts of all research articles were analysed with regards the methodologies of enquiry, the types of evidence produced and the issues of study they endeavored upon. Percentages were developed as to enable conclusions to be drawn. RESULTS: The results for the category methodologies used were 7% experimental, 6% quasi-experimental, 39% non-experimental, 2% ethnographical studies, 7% phenomenological, 4% grounded theory, 1% action research, 1% case study, 15% unspecified, 5.5% other, 0.5% meta-synthesis, 2% meta-analysis, 5% literature reviews and 3% secondary analysis. For the category types of evidence were 4% hypothesis/theory testing, 11% evaluative, 5% comparative, 2% correlational, 46% descriptive, 5% interpretative and 27% exploratory. For the category issues of study were 45% practice/clinical, 8% educational, 11% professional, 3% spiritual/ethical/metaphysical, 26% health promotion and 7% managerial/policy. CONCLUSIONS: Published studies can provide adequate evidences for practice if nursing journals conceptualise evidence emerging from non-experimental and qualitative studies as relevant types of evidences for practice and develop appropriate mechanisms for assessing their validity. Also, nursing journals need to increase and encourage the publication of studies that implement RCT methodology, systematic reviews, meta-synthesis and meta-analysis methodologies. Finally, nursing journals need to encourage more high quality research evidence that derive from interpretative, theory testing and evaluative types of studies that are practice relevant.
机译:背景:循证实践已经成为高效,有效和安全实践的必要条件。此外,从发表的研究中得出的证据被认为是指导实践的有效知识来源。目的:本文的目的是回顾2000-2006年间在十大普通护理期刊上发表的所有研究文章,以识别所使用的方法,这些研究产生的证据类型以及所致力于的问题。设计:实施定量内容分析以研究2000-2006年间排名前10的一般护理期刊的所有已发表研究论文。方法:该研究包括前十名一般护理杂志。分析了所有研究文章的摘要,包括询问的方法论,产生的证据类型以及他们致力于的研究问题。制定百分比以得出结论。结果:使用的分类方法的结果为7%的实验性,6%的准实验性,39%的非实验性,2%的民族志研究,7%的现象学,4%的扎根理论,1%的行为研究,1%的案例研究,未指定的占15%,其他的占5.5%,综合分析占0.5%,荟萃分析占2%,文献综述占5%,二级分析占3%。对于类别的证据类型,有4%的假设/理论测试,11%的评估/理论比较,5%的相关性,2%的相关性,46%的描述性,5%的解释性和27%的探索性。对于类别研究,问题是45%的实践/临床,8%的教育,11%的专业人员,3%的精神/伦理/形而上学,26%的健康促进和7%的管理/政策。结论:如果护理杂志将非实验性和定性研究中产生的证据概念化为实践的相关证据,并开发出评估其有效性的适当机制,则已发表的研究可以为实践提供足够的证据。此外,护理期刊需要增加和鼓励发表实施RCT方法论,系统评价,荟萃综合和荟萃分析方法论的研究。最后,护理杂志需要鼓励更多高质量的研究证据,这些证据来自与实践相关的解释性,理论检验和评估性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号