首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO, PROSECUTOR V. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO, DECISION ESTABLISHING THE PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES TO BE APPLIED TO REPARATIONS
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO, PROSECUTOR V. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO, DECISION ESTABLISHING THE PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES TO BE APPLIED TO REPARATIONS

机译:对国际刑事法院的介绍性说明:刚果民主共和国情节,检察长V. THOMAS LUBANGA DYILO,决定建立适用于赔偿的原则和程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the drafting of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ("ICC"), several states and nongovernmental organizations pressed for the inclusion of articles on reparations for victims of those convicted of crimes within the ICC's jurisdiction. The proposal found merit; the Statute allows victims to seek an award of reparations from the Court, but the text omits any detail about the modalities or scope of such awards. Instead, Article 75(1) of the Statute provides that "[t]he Court shall establish principles relating to reparation to, or in respect of, victims, including restitution, compensation and rehabilitation." The Trial Chamber in the Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo has taken up this mandate in response to applications filed with the Registry by alleged victims of the defendant. In a landmark decision, the ICC Trial Chamber I has set forth for the principles and procedures it will apply to this matter, acknowledging that the reparations scheme is not only a unique feature in the Statute, but also is a key feature. The Chamber unambiguously claims, however, that the principles it enunciates relating to reparations and their implementation are limited to the circumstances of the case before it.
机译:在起草《国际刑事法院罗马规约》期间,一些州和非政府组织要求在国际刑事法院管辖范围内纳入有关为被定罪的受害者提供赔偿的条款。提案很有价值。该规约允许受害人向法院寻求赔偿裁决,但案文省略了有关赔偿方式或范围的任何细节。相反,《规约》第75条第1款规定:“法院应建立与受害者的赔偿有关的原则,包括赔偿,赔偿和康复。”检察官诉托马斯·卢班加·迪伊洛(Thomas Lubanga Dyilo)的审判分庭承担了这项任务,以应对据称被告受害者向书记官处提出的申请。在一项具有里程碑意义的决定中,国际刑事法院第一审判分庭提出了适用于此问题的原则和程序,并承认赔偿计划不仅是《规约》的一项独特功能,而且是一项关键功能。但是,分庭明确主张,它所阐明的与赔偿及其实施有关的原则仅限于其面前案件的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号