首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: PROSECUTOR V. CALLIXTE MBARUSHIMANA: JUDGMENT ON THE APPEAL OF THE PROSECUTOR AGAINST THE DECISION OF PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I OF 16 DECEMBER 2011 ENTITLED 'DECISION ON THE CONFIRMATION OF CHARGES'
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: PROSECUTOR V. CALLIXTE MBARUSHIMANA: JUDGMENT ON THE APPEAL OF THE PROSECUTOR AGAINST THE DECISION OF PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I OF 16 DECEMBER 2011 ENTITLED 'DECISION ON THE CONFIRMATION OF CHARGES'

机译:国际刑事法院序言:检察长V.卡利克斯·姆巴鲁希马纳(C. CIXIXTE MBARUSHIMANA):2011年12月16日裁定第一审判分庭对检察官的上诉作出的判决为“关于确认收缴费用的决定”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On May 30, 2012, the Appeals Chamber (Chamber) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) voted unanimously to dismiss the appeal of the Prosecution against the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber not to confirm the charges against the alleged Congolese warlord Callixte Mbarushimana. The Prosecution had alleged Mbarashimana was criminally responsible under Article 25(3)(d) of the Rome Statute (Statute) for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by members of the Forces Democratiques de Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR) in the Kivu provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Prosecution had appealed the Pre-Trial Chamber's decision on three separate issues, all of which were rejected. The decision deserves special attention for several reasons. At the outset, this is the first decision rejecting charges against a suspect before the ICC that was appealed and the rejection subsequently confirmed on appeal. Moreover, the decision sets out the parameters of the Pre-Trial Chambers' powers during the confirmation process, and seems to have solidified the Pre-Trial Chambers' position as an early arbiter of evidence, not simply a barrier against prima facie baseless charges. Further, the decision tackled, albeit indirectly, the important issue of how and when the Prosecution is supposed to finalize its investigations in a case, which touches upon the principle of prosecutorial independence and raises some important practical considerations. Finally, the judgment also discusses the type of contribution required for criminal liability pursuant to Article 25(3)(d) of the Statute.
机译:2012年5月30日,国际刑事法院(ICC)上诉分庭(Chamber)一致投票驳回了检方针对预审分庭不确认对涉嫌刚果军阀Callixte Mbarushimana的指控的上诉。检方指控姆巴拉希马纳根据《罗马规约》第二十五条第三款第四项对卢旺达民主力量成员在卢旺达基伍各省犯下的危害人类罪和战争罪负刑事责任。刚果民主共和国。检方已对预审分庭关于三个独立问题的决定提出上诉,但均被驳回。由于几个原因,该决定值得特别注意。从一开始,这是第一个拒绝对被上诉人提出上诉的嫌疑人的指控的决定,随后在上诉中确认了拒绝。此外,该决定列出了预审分庭在确认过程中的权力参数,似乎巩固了预审分庭作为早期证据仲裁者的地位,而不仅仅是简单地阻止表面上毫无根据的指控的障碍。此外,该决定以间接方式解决了重要问题,即检方应如何和何时结案,这触及了检察独立性原则,并提出了一些重要的实际考虑。最后,判决书还讨论了根据《规约》第二十五条第3款(丁)项要求承担刑事责任的缴款类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号