...
【24h】

An assessment of innovation policy in Taiwan's electric vehicle industry

机译:台湾电动车产业创新政策评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on Rothwell and Zegveld's (1981) policy tool, we study an assessment of innovation policy of Taiwan's electric vehicle industry, and the policy comparison between Taiwan, USA, Japan, Germany and China. The validity assessment of 30 experts was conducted by adopting the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). This study found that the demand side was the most important in three dimensions of policy. Among the factors of policy tool, 'procurement', 'legal and regulatory' and 'public enterprise' were the top priorities for the future developments of the Taiwan's electric vehicle industry. The USA and Japan were ranked number 1 and number 2 in the 'environment' policy. The 'demand' policy in Taiwan has a greater influence on the development of electric vehicle industry.
机译:基于Rothwell和Zegveld(1981)的政策工具,我们研究了台湾电动汽车产业创新政策的评估,以及台湾,美国,日本,德国和中国之间的政策比较。采用层次分析法对30名专家进行了有效性评估。这项研究发现,需求方面是政策三个维度中最重要的方面。在政策工具中,“采购”,“法律法规”和“公共企业”是台湾电动汽车行业未来发展的重中之重。美国和日本在“环境”政策中分别排名第一和第二。台湾的“需求”政策对电动汽车产业的发展影响更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号