首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sustainable development >Political uses of social indicators: overview and application to sustainable development indicators
【24h】

Political uses of social indicators: overview and application to sustainable development indicators

机译:社会指标的政治用途:概述和适用于可持续发展指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social indicators and sustainable development are usually defined as quantitative tools whose utility lies exclusively in the operationalisation of policies defined as rationally organised collections of instrumental measures and actions designed to solve a well-defined social problem. As there are few examples of such success stories with sustainable development indicators, it is often lamented that they have failed to keep their promises. Yet, the sustainable development indicators industry is more prosperous than ever, and indicators such as the Ecological Footprint have gained wide support. This can be explained only by adopting a broader conception of policy making and of the role that indicators have to play. This paper builds on Hilgartner and Bosk's theory of public arenas, on the argumentative turn in public policy, and on the history of the unemployment rate in USA as a case study to analyse the current situation and the prospects for sustainable development indicators.
机译:社会指标和可持续发展通常被定义为定量工具,其效用完全取决于政策的运作,这些政策的定义是合理组织的工具措施和行动的集合,旨在解决定义明确的社会问题。由于很少有具有可持续发展指标的成功案例的例子,人们常常为未能遵守诺言而感到遗憾。然而,可持续发展指标行业比以往任何时候都更加繁荣,诸如生态足迹之类的指标得到了广泛的支持。这只能通过采用更广泛的政策制定概念和指标必须发挥的作用来解释。本文以希尔加特纳和博斯克的公共场所理论为基础,以公共政策的论证性转变为基础,并以美国的失业率历史为例,分析了可持续发展指标的现状和前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号