首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences >Numerical calibration of a yield limit function for rock materials by means of the Brazilian test and the uniaxial compression test
【24h】

Numerical calibration of a yield limit function for rock materials by means of the Brazilian test and the uniaxial compression test

机译:通过巴西测试和单轴压缩测试对岩石材料的屈服极限函数进行数值校准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerical investigations of rocks require a realistic material description, preferably one with a constitutive law that includes damage-plasticity. The constitutive law for this work can only be set up correctly with the correct yield function, It needs a biaxial compressive strength ratio r(sigma), and, more important, the uniaxial tensile strength (sigma) over bar (t0). Difficulties in determining these parameters on rock specimens experimentally lead to indirect methods or simply estimation of the parameters. The direct uniaxial tensile test is replaced by the indirect determination of the tensile strength by means of the Brazilian test. However, the stress states at failure in the direct uniaxial tensile test and the Brazilian test are not comparable. The biaxial compressive strength ratio is generally estimated. Numerical analyses of the Brazilian test show significantly different results for 2D and 3D calculations. A distinct stress peak at the surface is observable in 3D calculations only. High-speed camera images are taken from the fracture process. They support the theory that cracks emerge from the point exhibiting the distinct stress peak, instead from the center of the specimen. The complete stress state at failure is evaluated at this critical point with numerical linear elastic calculations. The yield function is then fitted to this critical stress state for all tests and evaluated for the (sigma) over bar (t0) and r(sigma), needed as input parameters. Numerical calculations of the Brazilian test are then performed with the calibrated yield function in the damage-plasticity constitutive law. They match the experimental results. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
机译:岩石的数值研究需要现实的材料描述,最好是具有包括损伤可塑性的本构定律的描述。只能使用正确的屈服函数正确设置本作品的本构定律,它需要双轴抗压强度比r(sigma),更重要的是,单轴抗拉强度(sigma)超过bar(t0)。在岩石样品上确定这些参数的困难在实验上导致了间接方法或简单地估计了参数。直接单轴拉伸试验被巴西试验间接测定拉伸强度所代替。但是,在直接单轴拉伸试验和巴西试验中,破坏时的应力状态无法比较。通常估计双轴抗压强度比。巴西测试的数值分析显示2D和3D计算的结果大不相同。仅在3D计算中才能观察到表面明显的应力峰值。高速相机图像是从断裂过程中获取的。他们支持这样的理论:裂纹从表现出明显应力峰值的点出现,而不是从试样中心出现。通过数值线性弹性计算在此临界点评估破坏时的完整应力状态。然后,将屈服函数拟合到所有测试的临界应力状态,并评估作为输入参数所需的bar(t0)和r(sigma)的(sigma)。然后,使用损伤-塑性本构律中的校准屈服函数对巴西试验进行数值计算。他们符合实验结果。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号