首页> 外文期刊>International journal of sports medicine >Perceptual responses in free vs. constant pace exercise.
【24h】

Perceptual responses in free vs. constant pace exercise.

机译:自由运动与恒定速度运动的知觉反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of the present investigation was to study the influence of free versus constant pace on perceived exertion (RPE) and estimated time Limit (ETL). Ten athletes performed a graded test aimed to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and the velocity associated with VO2max (vVO2max), a constant run to exhaustion at 90 % vVO2max to determine the time and distance to exhaustion at this relative velocity, a free paced run over the distance to exhaustion set by the time to exhaustion at 90 % vVO2max. Oxygen uptake and velocity during constant pace and free pace runs were both averaged throughout the entire period of exercise and without the last lap. The results did not show any significant effect of free versus constant pace on RPE and ETL. Averaged oxygen uptake between free and constant pace runs was not significantly different, whereas averaged vVO2max, % vVO2max and time to exhaustion was significantly higher for free pace runs only for the entire exercise. Consequently, compared to the constant pace run, the free pace one only allowed athletes to finish the run by a sprint which was effective in increasing performance, but not to perceive the free pacing run as being less strenuous than the constant pace one.
机译:本研究的目的是研究自由节奏与恒定节奏对感知劳累(RPE)和估计时限(ETL)的影响。十名运动员进行了一项分级测试,旨在确定最大摄氧量(VO2max)和与VO2max相关的速度(vVO2max),以90%vVO2max进行恒定的消耗力试验,以确定在该相对速度下消耗能量的时间和距离,并进行自由节奏在以90%vVO2max的消耗时间设定的消耗距离上运行。在整个运动过程中且没有最后一圈,均以恒定速度和自由节奏跑步期间的摄氧量和速度进行平均。结果未显示自由节奏与恒定节奏对RPE和ETL的任何显着影响。自由步和恒定步之间的平均摄氧量没有显着差异,而自由步的平均vVO2max,%vVO2max和力竭时间明显高于整个运动。因此,与恒定速度跑步相比,自由速度只能让运动员以短跑的方式完成跑步,这可以有效地提高成绩,但不能感觉到自由节奏的运动强度不如恒定速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号