...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of stroke: official journal of the International Stroke Society >The relevance of living supports on antiplatelet adherence and trial participation: The SPS3 trial
【24h】

The relevance of living supports on antiplatelet adherence and trial participation: The SPS3 trial

机译:生活支持与抗血小板粘附和试验参与的相关性:SPS3试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: While living with others has been associated with improved functional outcome after acute stroke, it is unclear if this affects adherence to stroke prevention measures. Aims: We examined the relationship between living arrangements and adherence to antiplatelet therapy assignment and participation status in an international randomized trial for secondary stroke prevention. Method: Antiplatelet therapy adherence, trial retention outcomes, and baseline characteristics for participants enrolled in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study were compared between those who lived alone vs. with others (n=2374). Participant status at end-of-trial was categorized into (1) on assigned antiplatelet, (2) off assigned antiplatelet by participant request, or (3) participant withdrew consent/lost to follow-up. Multivariable multivariate logistic regression was used to identify patient features at entry predictive of participant status at trial end. Results: Living arrangement, alone vs. with other(s), was not significantly associated with participant status. Participants enrolled in the United States/Canada (odds ratio 3·1, confidence intervals 2·0-5·0, vs. Latin America), taking more (7+) prescription medications (odds ratio 1·7, confidence intervals 1·1-2·7, vs. 0-2 medications), and scoring lower on the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (odds ratio 1·3, confidence intervals 1·1-1·5, per 10 points) were more likely to withdraw or become lost to follow-up in the study vs. completing the study on assigned antiplatelet therapy. Participants enrolled in the United States/Canada (odds ratio 5·0, confidence intervals 2·4-10·0, vs. Latin America) and taking fewer (0-2) medications (odds ratio 1·9, confidence intervals 1·2-3·1 vs. 3-6 medications) were more likely to request discontinuation of assigned antiplatelet medication vs. completing the study. Conclusion: Living with others was not independently predictive of protocol adherence in this cohort. Number of medications and Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale score may be more indicative of likelihood of trial participation and acceptance of long-term antiplatelet regimen.
机译:背景:虽然与他人同住与急性中风后功能改善有关,但尚不清楚这是否影响对中风预防措施的依从性。目的:我们在一项国际性二级卒中预防随机试验中研究了生活安排与坚持抗血小板治疗分配和参与状态之间的关系。方法:比较了单人住与其他人住在一起(n = 2374)的小皮层下卒中二级预防研究的参与者的抗血小板治疗依从性,试验保留结果和基线特征。试验结束时的参与者状态分为(1)分配的抗血小板药物;(2)参与者提出的要求将其分配给抗血小板药物;或(3)参与者撤回了同意/失去随访。多变量多因素logistic回归用于在入院时确定患者特征,并预测试验结束时的参与者状态。结果:单独的生活安排与与其他人的生活安排没有显着相关的参与者状态。参加美国/加拿大的参与者(赔率比3·1,置信区间2·0-5·0,而拉丁美洲),服用了更多(7+)处方药(赔率比1·7,置信区间1· 1-2.7比0-2药物)和卒中特定生活质量量表的得分更低(赔率1·3,置信区间1·1-1·5,每10分)与完成指定抗血小板治疗的研究相比,退出或迷失了后续研究。参加美国/加拿大的参与者(赔率比5·0,置信区间2·4-10·0,而拉丁美洲),并且服用的药物较少(0-2)(赔率比1·9,置信区间1· 2-3.1与3-6的药物相比完成研究更可能要求终止分配的抗血小板药物。结论:在这个队列中,与他人一起生活并不能独立预测遵守方案的情况。药物的数量和卒中特定生活质量量表评分可能更表明试验参与和接受长期抗血小板治疗的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号