首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Pretreatment factors significantly influence quality of life in cancer patients: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) analysis.
【24h】

Pretreatment factors significantly influence quality of life in cancer patients: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) analysis.

机译:预处理因素显着影响癌症患者的生活质量:放射治疗肿瘤学小组(RTOG)分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of pretreatment factors on quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment QOL (via Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy [FACT], version 2) was obtained in 1,428 patients in several prospective Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials including nonmetastatic head-and-neck (n = 1139), esophageal (n = 174), lung (n = 51), rectal (n = 47), and prostate (n = 17) cancer patients. Clinically meaningful differences between groups were defined as a difference of 1 standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: The mean FACT score for all patients was 86 (20.7-112) with SEM of 5.3. Statistically significant differences in QOL were observed based on age, race, Karnofsky Performance Status, marital status, education level, income level, and employment status, but not by gender or primary site. Using the SEM, there were clinically meaningful differences between patients /=65 years. Hispanics had worse QOL than whites. FACT increased linearly with higher Karnofsky Performance Status and income levels. Married patients (or live-in relationships) had a better QOL than single, divorced, or widowed patients. College graduates had better QOL than those with less education. CONCLUSION: Most pretreatment factors meaningfully influenced baseline QOL. The potentially devastating impact of a cancer diagnosis, particularly in young and minority patients, must be addressed.
机译:目的:该分析的目的是评估预处理因素对癌症患者生活质量(QOL)的影响。方法和材料:在几项前瞻性放射治疗肿瘤组(RTOG)试验(包括非转移性头颈癌(n = 1139),食管癌)中的1,428名患者中获得了治疗前的QOL(通过癌症治疗功能评估[FACT],版本2)。 (n = 174),肺癌(n = 51),直肠(n = 47)和前列腺癌(n = 17)癌症患者。组之间临床上有意义的差异定义为1个标准测量误差(SEM)的差异。结果:所有患者的平均FACT评分为86(20.7-112),SEM为5.3。根据年龄,种族,卡诺夫斯基绩效状况,婚姻状况,教育水平,收入水平和就业状况,观察到生活质量的统计学差异,但未按性别或主要地点进行观察。使用SEM,患者 / = 65岁之间存在临床上有意义的差异。西班牙裔美国人的生活质量较白人差。 FACT随着Karnofsky绩效状态和收入水平的提高而线性增加。已婚患者(或住户关系)的生活质量比单身,离婚或丧偶的患者更好。大学毕业生的生活质量要好于教育程度较低的学生。结论:大多数预处理因素对基线生活质量有显着影响。必须解决癌症诊断的潜在破坏性影响,尤其是在年轻和少数患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号