首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients: matched-pair comparison with conventional radiotherapy.
【24h】

Impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients: matched-pair comparison with conventional radiotherapy.

机译:调强放疗对头颈癌患者健康相关生活质量的影响:与传统放疗的配对对比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared with conventional RT for the quality of life (QOL) of head and neck cancer survivors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cross-sectional QOL measures (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL questionnaire C30 and head and neck cancer module) were used with a French multicenter cohort of patients cured of head and neck cancer (follow-up > or = 1 year) who had received bilateral neck RT (> or = 45 Gy) as a part of their initial treatment. We compared the QOL mean scores regarding RT modality (conventional RT vs. IMRT). The patients of the two groups were matched (one to one) according to the delay between the end of RT and the timing of the QOL evaluation and the T stage. Each QOL item was divided into two relevant levels of severity: "not severe" (responses, "not at all" and "a little") vs. "severe" (responses "quite a bit" and "very much"). The association between the type of RT and the prevalence of severe symptoms was approximated, through multivariate analysis using the prevalence odds ratio. RESULTS: Two comparable groups (67 pairs) were available. Better scores were observed on the head and neck cancer module QOL questionnaire for the IMRT group, especially for dry mouth and sticky saliva (p < 0.0001). Severe symptoms were more frequent with conventional RT concerning saliva modifications and oral discomfort. The adjusted prevalence odds ratios were 3.17 (p = 0.04) for dry mouth, 3.16 (p = 0.02) for sticky saliva, 3.58 (p = 0.02) for pain in the mouth, 3.35 (p = 0.04) for pain in the jaw, 2.60 (p = 0.02) for difficulties opening the mouth, 2.76 (p = 0.02) for difficulties with swallowing, and 2.68 (p = 0.03) for trouble with eating. CONCLUSION: The QOL assessment of head and neck cancer survivors demonstrated the benefit of IMRT, particularly in the areas of salivary dysfunction and oral discomfort.
机译:目的:评估调强放疗(IMRT)与常规放疗相比对头颈癌幸存者的生活质量(QOL)的益处。方法和材料:采用横断面QOL措施(欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织QOL调查问卷C30和头颈癌模块)与法国多中心队列研究的头颈癌治愈患者一起使用(随访>或= 1年)作为初始治疗的一部分接受了双侧颈RT(>或= 45 Gy)。我们比较了有关RT方式(传统RT与IMRT)的QOL平均得分。根据RT结束与QOL评估时间和T期之间的延迟,将两组患者配对(一对一)。每个QOL项目都分为两个相关的严重性级别:“不严重”(响应,“根本不”和“有点”)与“严重”(响应“相当”和“非常”)。通过使用患病几率比进行多变量分析,可以估算出RT类型与严重症状的患病率之间的关联。结果:有两个可比较的组(67对)。 IMRT组在头颈癌模块QOL调查表中观察到更好的分数,尤其是口干和唾液粘稠(p <0.0001)。在常规放疗中,严重的症状在唾液修饰和口腔不适方面更为常见。调整后的患病几率是:口干为3.17(p = 0.04),粘性唾液为3.16(p = 0.02),口腔疼痛为3.58(p = 0.02),下巴疼痛为3.35(p = 0.04),张口困难为2.60(p = 0.02),吞咽困难为2.76(p = 0.02),进食困难为2.68(p = 0.03)。结论:头颈癌幸存者的生活质量评估证明了IMRT的益处,特别是在唾液功能障碍和口腔不适方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号