首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Hybrid IMRT plans-concurrently treating conventional and IMRT beams for improved breast irradiation and reduced planning time.
【24h】

Hybrid IMRT plans-concurrently treating conventional and IMRT beams for improved breast irradiation and reduced planning time.

机译:混合IMRT计划-同时治疗常规光束和IMRT光束,以改善乳房照射并减少计划时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate a hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique as a class solution for treatment of the intact breast. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The following five plan techniques were compared for 10 breast patients using dose-volume histogram analysis: conventional wedged-field tangents (Tangents), forward-planned field-within-a-field tangents (FIF), IMRT-only tangents (IMRT tangents), conventional open plus IMRT tangents (4-field hybrid), and conventional open plus IMRT tangents with 2 anterior oblique IMRT beams (6-field hybrid). RESULTS: The 4-field hybrid and FIF achieved dose distributions better than Tangents and IMRT tangents. The volume of tissue outside the planning target volume receiving >/=110% of prescribed dose was largest for IMRT tangents (average 158 cc) and least for 6-field hybrid (average 1 cc); the FIF and 4-field hybrid were comparable (average 15 cc). Heart volume >/=30 Gy averaged 13 cc for all techniques, except Tangents, for which it was 32 cc. Average total lung volume >/=20 Gy was 7% for all. Contralateral breast doses were <3% for all. Planning time for hybrid techniques was significantly less than for conventional FIF technique. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-field hybrid technique is a viable class solution. The 6-field hybrid technique creates the most conformal dose distribution at the expense of more normal tissue receiving low dose.
机译:目的:评估混合强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)技术作为治疗完整乳房的经典解决方案。方法和材料:使用剂量-体积直方图分析比较了10种乳腺癌患者的以下五种计划技术:常规楔形场切线(Tangents),前瞻性场内切线(FIF),仅IMRT切线(IMRT切线),常规的开放加IMRT切线(4场混合)和具有2条前斜IMRT束的常规的开放加IMRT切线(6场混合)。结果:4场杂交和FIF的剂量分布优于切线和IMRT切线。计划目标体积外的组织体积在IMRT切线(平均158 cc)时大于或等于110%的规定剂量,对于6场混合体(平均1 cc)最大。 FIF和4场混合动力车相当(平均15 cc)。所有技术中,> / = 30 Gy的心体积平均为13 cc,但“切线”为32 cc。所有患者的平均总肺体积> / = 20 Gy为7%。对侧乳房所有剂量均<3%。混合技术的计划时间明显少于常规FIF技术。结论:4场混合技术是可行的解决方案。 6场混合技术创建了最适形的剂量分布,但以更多的正常组织接受了低剂量为代价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号