首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: A randomized Phase II study.
【24h】

Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: A randomized Phase II study.

机译:顺铂与顺铂加吉西他滨联合化学放化疗的病理反应和毒性评估:一项II期随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with cisplatin (C) concurrent with radiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB2, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma in a preoperative setting. The main endpoints were the pathologic response rate and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 83 patients were randomized to either C or GC. Treatment consisted of six doses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for Arm 1 (C) and six doses of gemcitabine at 125 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for or Arm 2 (GC) Both regimens were administered concurrent with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 2-Gy fractions for 5 weeks. After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent radical hysterectomy. RESULTS: All 83 patients were studied for toxicity and 80 for response. The complete pathologic response rate in the C arm and GC arm was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35.5-73%) and 77.5% (95% confidence interval, 57-90%; p = 0.0201). Among those with a partial response, 7 patients each had high and intermediate-high risk factors for recurrence in their surgical specimens in the C arm vs. 2 and 3 patients, respectively, with these characteristics in the CG arm. The number of weekly doses and the dose intensity of GC were lower than for C. The time to complete external beam radiotherapy also favored the C arm. The CG combination produced greater GI and hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: The radiosensitizing combination of GC achieved a greater pathologic response rate than C in the treatment of cervical cancer.
机译:目的:比较吉西他滨和顺铂(GC)与顺铂(C)在国际妇产科联合会IB2,IIA和IIB期宫颈癌术前放疗的同时进行放疗。主要终点为病理反应率和毒性。方法和材料:总共83例患者被随机分为C或GC。对于第1组(C),治疗包括每周六剂40 mg / m(2)的顺铂和每周六剂125 mg / m(2)的吉西他滨加每周40 mg / m(2)的顺铂。第2组(GC)两种方案均与50 Gy的外部束放射治疗同时以2 Gy的比例进行治疗,持续5周。放化疗后,患者接受了根治性子宫切除术。结果:所有83例患者均进行了毒性研究,其中80例进行了反应研究。 C组和GC组的完全病理反应率分别为55%(95%置信区间,35.5-73%)和77.5%(95%置信区间,57-90%; p = 0.0201)。在部分缓解的患者中,C臂的手术标本中有7例分别具有高和中高复发风险的因素,而CG臂中分别有2例和3例具有这些特征。每周剂量的数量和GC的剂量强度均低于C。C组完成外部束放射治疗的时间也偏向于C组。 CG组合产生更大的GI和血液学毒性。结论:在宫颈癌的治疗中,GC的放射增敏组合的病理反应率高于C。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号