...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Strategic Property Management >DOES EVA TRULY REFLECT THE PERFORMANCE OF PROPERTY COMPANIES IN CHINA?
【24h】

DOES EVA TRULY REFLECT THE PERFORMANCE OF PROPERTY COMPANIES IN CHINA?

机译:EVA确实反映了中国房地产公司的表现吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the economic value added (EVA) of 18 major Chinese property companies from 2006 to 2012. We categorize the companies in two ways: 1) companies concentrating on property vs multi-functional companies and 2) state-owned enterprises (SOEs) vs privately-owned enterprises (POEs). We find that on average, the mainland property companies experienced a negative EVA during the period 2006-2012. This is due to the companies undertaking long-term projects, and the companies do not recognize capital gain from property appreciation as income. Hence the EVA of the companies is, in fact, understated. The results also reveal that POEs outperform SOEs in terms of EVA. This reflects the inefficiency of SOEs. This research has two important implications to investors. Firstly, besides looking at the EVA of the companies, investors should also understand the nature of businesses of the companies thoroughly. Secondly, investors investing in emerging markets like China should have a thorough understanding of their market characteristics. This study can act as a reference for future studies in EVA of property companies in other emerging economies in the world.
机译:这项研究调查了2006年至2012年间18家中国主要房地产公司的经济增加值(EVA)。我们将公司分为两种方式:1)专注于房地产公司与多功能公司,以及2)国有企业(SOE)与私人企业(POE)。我们发现,平均而言,内地房地产公司在2006-2012年期间的EVA负值。这是由于公司正在进行长期项目,并且公司未将房地产增值产生的资本收益确认为收入。因此,实际上,这些公司的EVA被低估了。结果还表明,就EVA而言,POE优于SOE。这反映了国有企业的低效率。这项研究对投资者有两个重要意义。首先,除了着眼于公司的EVA外,投资者还应该透彻了解公司业务的性质。其次,对像中国这样的新兴市场进行投资的投资者应该对其市场特征有透彻的了解。该研究可为世界其他新兴经济体的房地产公司的EVA未来研究提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号