...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Comparison of different fractionation schedules toward a single fraction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer using 3-dimensional radiobiological models
【24h】

Comparison of different fractionation schedules toward a single fraction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer using 3-dimensional radiobiological models

机译:使用3D放射生物学模型比较高剂量率近距离放射疗法作为低危前列腺癌的单一疗法中针对单一组分的不同分级方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose The aim of the present study was the investigation of different fractionation schemes to estimate their clinical impact. For this purpose, widely applied radiobiological models and dosimetric measures were used to associate their results with clinical findings. Methods and Materials The dose distributions of 12 clinical high-dose-rate brachytherapy implants for prostate were evaluated in relation to different fractionation schemes. The fractionation schemes compared were: (1) 1 fraction of 20 Gy; (2) 2 fractions of 14 Gy; (3) 3 fractions of 11 Gy; and (4) 4 fractions of 9.5 Gy. The clinical effectiveness of the different fractionation schemes was estimated through the complication-free tumor control probability (P+), the biologically effective uniform dose, and the generalized equivalent uniform dose index. Results For the different fractionation schemes, the tumor control probabilities were 98.5% in 1 × 20 Gy, 98.6% in 2 × 14 Gy, 97.5% in 3 × 11 Gy, and 97.8% in 4 × 9.5 Gy. The corresponding P+ values were 88.8% in 1 × 20 Gy, 83.9% in 2 × 14 Gy, 86.0% in 3 × 11 Gy, and 82.3% in 4 × 9.5 Gy. With use of the fractionation scheme 4 × 9.5 Gy as reference, the isoeffective schemes regarding tumor control for 1, 2, and 3 fractions were 1 × 19.68 Gy, 2 × 13.75 Gy, and 3 × 11.05 Gy. The optimum fractionation schemes for 1, 2, 3, and 4 fractions were 1 × 19.16 Gy with a P+ of 91.8%, 2 × 13.2 Gy with a P + of 89.6%, 3 × 10.6 Gy with a P+ of 88.4%, and 4 × 9.02 Gy with a P+ of 86.9%. Conclusions Among the fractionation schemes 1 × 20 Gy, 2 × 14 Gy, 3 × 11 Gy, and 4 × 9.5 Gy, the first scheme was more effective in terms of P+. After performance of a radiobiological optimization, it was shown that a single fraction of 19.2 to 19.7 Gy (average 19.5 Gy) should produce at least the same benefit as that given by the 4 × 9.5 Gy scheme, and it should reduce the expected total complication probability by approximately 40% to 55%.
机译:目的本研究的目的是研究不同的分级方案,以评估其临床影响。为此,广泛使用的放射生物学模型和剂量测定方法将其结果与临床发现相关联。方法和材料针对不同的分割方案,评估了12种临床高剂量率近距离放射治疗前列腺植入物的剂量分布。所比较的分级方案为:(1)1份20 Gy。 (2)2个14 Gy的分数; (3)3个11 Gy分数; (4)9.5 Gy的4馏分。通过无并发症的肿瘤控制概率(P +),生物学有效均匀剂量和广义等效均匀剂量指数评估了不同分级方案的临床效果。结果对于不同的分级方案,在1×20 Gy中,肿瘤控制概率为98.5%,在2×14 Gy中为98.6%,在3×11 Gy中为97.5%,在4×9.5 Gy中为97.8%。相应的P +值在1×20 Gy中为88.8%,在2×14 Gy中为83.9%,在3×11 Gy中为86.0%,在4×9.5 Gy中为82.3%。以4×9.5 Gy分级方案为参考,关于1、2和3级肿瘤控制的等效方案为1×19.68 Gy,2×13.75 Gy和3×11.05 Gy。针对1、2、3和4个馏分的最佳分馏方案是:1×19.16 Gy,P +为91.8%; 2×13.2 Gy,P +为89.6%; 3×10.6 Gy,P +为88.4%;以及4×9.02 Gy,P +为86.9%。结论在分馏方案1×20 Gy,2×14 Gy,3×11 Gy和4×9.5 Gy中,第一种方案在P +方面更有效。在进行了放射生物学优化后,结果表明,19.2至19.7 Gy(平均19.5 Gy)的单个分数至少应产生与4×9.5 Gy方案相同的益处,并且应减少预期的总并发症机率降低约40%至55%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号