...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >A paired, double-blind, randomized comparison of a moisturizing durable barrier cream to 10% glycerine cream in the prophylactic management of postmastectomy irradiation skin care: Trans tasman radiation oncology group (TROG) 04.01
【24h】

A paired, double-blind, randomized comparison of a moisturizing durable barrier cream to 10% glycerine cream in the prophylactic management of postmastectomy irradiation skin care: Trans tasman radiation oncology group (TROG) 04.01

机译:在乳房切除术后放射皮肤护理的预防性管理中,将保湿持久屏障霜与10%甘油霜进行配对,双盲,随机比较:塔斯曼放射肿瘤学组(TROG)04.01

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: A previous, unblinded study demonstrated that an alcohol-free barrier film containing an acrylate terpolymer (ATP) was effective in reducing skin reactions compared with a 10% glycerine cream (sorbolene). The different appearances of these products precluded a blinded comparison. To test the acrylate terpolymer principle in a double-blinded manner required the use of an alternative cream formulation, a moisturizing durable barrier cream (MDBC); the study was conducted by the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) as protocol 04.01. Methods and Materials: A total of 333 patients were randomized; 1 patient was ineligible and 14 patients withdrew or had less than 7 weeks' observations, leaving 318 for analysis. The chest wall was divided into medial and lateral compartments, and patients were randomized to have MDBC applied daily to the medial or lateral compartment and sorbolene to the other compartment. Weekly observations, photographs, and symptom scores (pain and pruritus) were collected to week 12 or resolution of skin reactions if earlier. Skin dose was confirmed by centrally calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters. Results: Rates of medial and lateral compartment Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3, greater than or equal to grade 3 skin reactions were 23% and 41%, but rates by skin care product were identical at 32%. There was no significant difference between MDBC and sorbolene in the primary endpoint of peak skin reactions or secondary endpoints of area-under-the-curve skin reaction scores. Conclusions: The MDBC did not reduce the peak skin reaction compared to sorbolene. It is possible that this is related to the difference in the formulation of the cream compared with the film formulation. Skin dosimetry verification and double blinding are essential for radiation skin care comparative studies.
机译:目的:之前的一项无盲研究表明,与10%的甘油乳脂(山梨醇)相比,包含丙烯酸三元共聚物(ATP)的无酒精阻隔膜可有效减少皮肤反应。这些产品的外观不同,因此无法进行盲目比较。为了以双盲方式测试丙烯酸酯三元共聚物的原理,需要使用另一种乳膏配方,即一种保湿持久的隔离乳膏(MDBC);这项研究是由Trans Tasman放射肿瘤学小组(TROG)按照协议04.01进行的。方法与材料:共333例患者被随机分配。 1例不合格,14例退出或观察不到7周,剩下318例需要分析。胸壁分为内侧和外侧隔室,患者被随机分配,每天将MDBC应用于内侧或外侧隔室,将山梨醇应用于另一隔室。到第12周收集每周的观察结果,照片和症状评分(疼痛和瘙痒),如果较早则消除皮肤反应。通过中央校准的热发光剂量计确认皮肤剂量。结果:大于或等于3级皮肤反应的内侧和外侧隔室通用毒性标准(CTC)的发生率分别为23%和41%,但护肤品的发生率相同,为32%。 MDBC和山梨醇之间在峰值皮肤反应的主要终点或曲线下皮肤反应区域得分的次要终点之间没有显着差异。结论:与山梨醇相比,MDBC不会降低皮肤反应高峰。这可能与乳霜配方与薄膜配方的差异有关。皮肤剂量学验证和双盲对辐射皮肤护理比较研究至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号