首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Prognostic impact of erythropoietin expression and erythropoietin receptor expression on locoregional control and survival of patients irradiated for stage II/III non-small-cell lung cancer.
【24h】

Prognostic impact of erythropoietin expression and erythropoietin receptor expression on locoregional control and survival of patients irradiated for stage II/III non-small-cell lung cancer.

机译:促红细胞生成素和促红细胞生成素受体表达对II / III期非小细胞肺癌患者局部部位控制和生存的预后影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Prognostic factors can guide the physician in selecting the optimal treatment for an individual patient. This study investigates the prognostic value of erythropoietin (EPO) and EPO receptor (EPO-R) expression of tumor cells for locoregional control and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen factors were investigated in 62 patients irradiated for stage II/III NSCLC, as follows: age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), histology, grading, TNM/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgery, chemotherapy, pack years (average number of packages of cigarettes smoked per day multiplied by the number of years smoked), smoking during radiotherapy, hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy, EPO expression, and EPO-R expression. Additionally, patients with tumors expressing both EPO and EPO-R were compared to those expressing either EPO or EPO-R and to those expressing neither EPO nor EPO-R. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, improved locoregional control was associated with AJCC stage II cancer (p < 0.048), surgery (p < 0.042), no smoking during radiotherapy (p = 0.024), and no EPO expression (p = 0.001). A trend was observed for a KPS of >70 (p = 0.08), an N stage of 0 to 1 (p = 0.07), and no EPO-R expression (p = 0.10). On multivariate analysis, AJCC stage II and no EPO expression remained significant. No smoking during radiotherapy was almost significant. On univariate analysis, improved survival was associated with N stage 0 to 1 (p = 0.009), surgery (p = 0.039), hemoglobin levels of >/=12 g/d (p = 0.016), and no EPO expression (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, N stage 0 to 1 and no EPO expression maintained significance. Hemoglobin levels of >/=12 g/d were almost significant. On subgroup analyses, patients with tumors expressing both EPO and EPO-R had worse outcomes than those expressing either EPO or EPO-R and those expressing neither EPO nor RPO-R. CONCLUSIONS: EPO expression of tumor cells was an independent prognostic factor for locoregional control and survival in patients irradiated for NSCLC. EPO-R expression showed a trend. Patients with tumors expressing both EPO and EPO-R have an unfavorable prognosis.
机译:目的:预后因素可以指导医生为单个患者选择最佳治疗方法。这项研究调查了促红细胞生成素(EPO)和EPO受体(EPO-R)表达的肿瘤细胞对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者局部控制和生存的预后价值。方法和材料:对62例接受II / III期NSCLC照射的患者进行了十四项因素调查,包括年龄,性别,卡诺夫斯基绩效评分(KPS),组织学,分级,TNM /美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期,手术,化学疗法,包装年限(每天抽烟的平均包装数乘以抽烟的年数),放疗期间吸烟,放疗期间血红蛋白水平,EPO表达和EPO-R表达。另外,将同时表达EPO和EPO-R的肿瘤患者与既表达EPO或EPO-R的患者又与既不表达EPO也不表达EPO-R的患者进行比较。结果:单因素分析表明,局部区域控制的改善与AJCC II期癌症(p <0.048),手术(p <0.042),放疗期间不吸烟(p = 0.024)和EPO表达(p = 0.001)有关。对于KPS> 70(p = 0.08),N阶段为0到1(p = 0.07)且没有EPO-R表达(p = 0.10)观察到趋势。在多变量分析中,AJCC II期和无EPO表达仍然显着。放射治疗期间几乎没有吸烟。在单因素分析中,生存改善与N阶段0至1(p = 0.009),手术(p = 0.039),血红蛋白水平> / = 12 g / d(p = 0.016)和无EPO表达有关(p = 0.001)。在多变量分析中,N期0到1且无EPO表达保持显着性。血红蛋白水平> / = 12 g / d几乎是显着的。在亚组分析中,同时表达EPO和EPO-R的肿瘤患者的结局要比既表达EPO或EPO-R的患者又不表达EPO和RPO-R的患者差。结论:肿瘤细胞的EPO表达是NSCLC照射患者局部控制和生存的独立预后因素。 EPO-R表达呈趋势。同时表达EPO和EPO-R的肿瘤患者预后不良。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号