...
【24h】

In reply to Hastings and Iganej

机译:回复黑斯廷斯和伊甘妮

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We thank Drs Hastings and Iganej for their interest and appreciation of the American College of Radiology Appropri-ateness-Criteria for induction and adjuvant therapy for stage N2 non-small cell lung cancer (1,2). Their reference to the update of Roth et al (3) will be incorporated into the next version of the Appropriateness Criteria. It is not unusual for the results of randomized studies to be modified with longer follow-up, and in this case the difference between the arms has decreased. It nevertheless remains substantial for all patients (3-year overall survival 43% vs 19%) and is particularly large for patients who had a complete resection (59% vs 24%). It is unclear whether this update would have any significant impact on the meta-analysis (4) showing a benefit to induction chemotherapy. An updated meta-analysis that included 6 additional randomized trials confirmed this as well (5). Our overall recommendation is not, therefore, affected. The literature continues to show that initial surgery for N2 non-small cell lung cancer is not the optimal approach; multiple randomized studies, as indicated in our review, demonstrate improved outcomes with neoadjuvant treatment, either chemotherapy or chemoradiation.
机译:我们感谢Hastings博士和Iganej博士对美国放射学院适当性标准对N2期非小细胞肺癌的诱导和辅助治疗的关注和赞赏(1,2)。他们对Roth等人(3)的更新的引用将并入下一版的“适当性标准”。对随机研究的结果进行更长时间的随访修改并不罕见,在这种情况下,两组之间的差异已经缩小。尽管如此,它对所有患者而言仍然是实质性的(3年总生存率分别为43%和19%),对于完全切除的患者尤其如此(59%对24%)。目前尚不清楚这一更新是否会对荟萃分析产生任何重大影响(4),从而显示出对诱导化疗的益处。一项更新的荟萃分析(包括6个其他随机试验)也证实了这一点(5)。因此,我们的总体建议不受影响。文献继续显示,N2非小细胞肺癌的初始手术不是最佳方法。如我们的评论所述,多项随机研究表明,新辅助治疗(化学疗法或化学放疗)的治疗效果得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号