...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Variable circular collimator in robotic radiosurgery: a time-efficient alternative to a mini-multileaf collimator?
【24h】

Variable circular collimator in robotic radiosurgery: a time-efficient alternative to a mini-multileaf collimator?

机译:机器人放射外科中的可变圆形准直仪:微型多叶准直仪的省时替代方案吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Compared with many small circular beams used in CyberKnife treatments, beam's eye view-shaped fields are generally more time-efficient for dose delivery. However, beam's eye view-shaping devices, such as a mini-multileaf collimator (mMLC), are not presently available for CyberKnife, although a variable-aperture collimator (Iris, 12 field diameters; 5-60 mm) is available. We investigated whether the Iris can mimic noncoplanar mMLC treatments using a limited set of principal beam orientations (nodes) to produce time-efficient treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from 10 lung cancer patients and the beam-orientation optimization algorithm "Cycle" were used to generate stereotactic treatment plans (3 x 20 Gy) for a CyberKnife virtually equipped with a mMLC. Typically, 10-16 favorable beam orientations were selected from 117 available robot node positions using beam's eye view-shaped fields with uniform fluence. Second, intensity-modulated Iris plans were generated by inverse optimization of nonisocentric circular candidate beams targeted from the same nodes selected in the mMLC plans. The plans were evaluated using the mean lung dose, lung volume receiving >/=20 Gy, conformality index, number of nodes, beams, and monitor units, and estimated treatment time. RESULTS: The mMLC plans contained an average of 12 nodes and 11,690 monitor units. For a comparable mean lung dose, the Iris plans contained 12 nodes, 64 beams, and 21,990 monitor units. The estimated fraction duration was 12.2 min (range, 10.8-13.5) for the mMLC plans and 18.4 min (range, 12.9-28.5) for the Iris plans. In contrast to the mMLC plans, the treatment time for the Iris plans increased with an increasing target volume. The Iris plans were, on average, 40% longer than the corresponding mMLC plans for small targets (<80 cm(3)) and
机译:目的:与射波刀治疗中使用的许多小圆形光束相比,光束的眼形场通常更有效地进行剂量输送。但是,尽管可以使用可变孔径的准直仪(虹膜,12视场直径; 5-60 mm),但射波刀的眼影整形设备(如微型多叶准直仪(mMLC))目前不适用于Cyber​​Knife。我们研究了虹膜是否可以使用一组有限的主光束方向(节点)来模仿非共面mMLC治疗,以产生省时的治疗计划。方法和材料:使用来自10名肺癌患者的数据和射线定向优化算法“ Cycle”为虚拟配备了mMLC的射波刀生成立体定向治疗计划(3 x 20 Gy)。通常,使用具有均匀通量的光束眼形场从117个可用的机器人节点位置中选择10-16个有利的光束方向。其次,通过对从mMLC计划中选择的相同节点瞄准的非等心圆形候选光束进行逆优化,生成了强度调制的Iris计划。使用平均肺部剂量,接受肺量> / = 20 Gy,保形指数,结节数,射线和监护仪单位以及估计的治疗时间来评估计划。结果:mMLC计划平均包含12个节点和11,690个监视单元。对于可比较的平均肺部剂量,虹膜计划包含12个节点,64个波束和21,990个监视单元。对于mMLC计划,估计的分数持续时间为12.2分钟(范围为10.8-13.5),对于Iris计划,估计的持续时间为18.4分钟(范围为12.9-28.5)。与mMLC计划相比,Iris计划的治疗时间随着目标量的增加而增加。对于小型目标(<80 cm(3)),虹膜计划平均比相应的mMLC计划长40%,对于大型目标,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号