...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.
【24h】

Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.

机译:在合作组的背景下,针对直肠癌目标体积确定部位特异性共识地图集实施的前瞻性随机双盲先导研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Variations in target volume delineation represent a significant hurdle in clinical trials involving conformal radiotherapy. We sought to determine the effect of a consensus guideline-based visual atlas on contouring the target volumes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A representative case was contoured (Scan 1) by 14 physician observers and a reference expert with and without target volume delineation instructions derived from a proposed rectal cancer clinical trial involving conformal radiotherapy. The gross tumor volume (GTV), and two clinical target volumes (CTVA, including the internal iliac, presacral, and perirectal nodes, and CTVB, which included the external iliac nodes) were contoured. The observers were randomly assigned to receipt (Group A) or nonreceipt (Group B) of a consensus guideline and atlas for anorectal cancers and then instructed to recontour the same case/images (Scan 2). Observer variation was analyzed volumetrically using the conformation number (CN, where CN = 1 equals total agreement). RESULTS: Of 14 evaluable contour sets (1 expert and 7 Group A and 6 Group B observers), greater agreement was found for the GTV (mean CN, 0.75) than for the CTVs (mean CN, 0.46-0.65). Atlas exposure for Group A led to significantly increased interobserver agreement for CTVA (mean initial CN, 0.68, after atlas use, 0.76; p = .03) and increased agreement with the expert reference (initial mean CN, 0.58; after atlas use, 0.69; p = .02). For the GTV and CTVB, neither the interobserver nor the expert agreement was altered after atlas exposure. CONCLUSION: Consensus guideline atlas implementation resulted in a detectable difference in interobserver agreement and a greater approximation of expert volumes for the CTVA but not for the GTV or CTVB in the specified case. Visual atlas inclusion should be considered as a feature in future clinical trials incorporating conformal RT.
机译:目的:目标体积轮廓的变化代表了涉及保形放疗的临床试验中的重大障碍。我们试图确定基于共识准则的视觉地图集对目标体积轮廓的影响。方法和材料:由14名医师观察员和一名参考专家对一个代表性病例进行了轮廓分析(扫描1),该专家有或没有从拟议的涉及保形放疗的直肠癌临床试验得出的目标体积描绘说明。绘制了总肿瘤体积(GTV)和两个临床目标体积(CTVA,包括内、,前和直肠周围结节,以及CTVB,包括the外结节)的轮廓。观察者被随机分配到共识指南和肛门直肠癌图集的接收组(A组)或未接收组(B组),然后被指示重新绘制相同病例/图像(扫描2)。使用构象数(CN,其中CN = 1等于总一致性)对观察者的变异进行体积分析。结果:在14个可评估的轮廓集(1个专家,7个A组和6个B组观察者)中,GTV(CN平均值为0.75)比CTV(CN平均值为0.46-0.65)更好。 A组的Atlas暴露量导致CTVA的观察者之间的共识显着增加(在Atlas使用后,初始CN平均为0.68,0.76; p = .03),并且与专家参考之间的一致性得到了提高(初始平均CN为0.58;在Atlas使用后为0.69)。 ; p = .02)。对于GTV和CTVB,在地图集曝光后,观察者之间或专家之间的协议都没有改变。结论:共识性指导原则地图集的实施导致观察者之间的协议之间存在可检测的差异,并且在特定情况下,CTVA而非GTV或CTVB的专家数量更大。视觉图谱的纳入应被认为是纳入保形RT的未来临床试验的特征。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号