...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of rehabilitation research: Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschungon >Test-retest reproducibility of two short-form balance measures used in individuals with stroke
【24h】

Test-retest reproducibility of two short-form balance measures used in individuals with stroke

机译:中风患者使用的两种简短平衡测试的重测重现性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to determine the test-retest reproducibility of the seven-item Short-Form Berg Balance Scale (SFBBS) and the five-item Short-Form Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (SFPASS) in individuals with chronic stroke. Fifty-two chronic stroke patients from two rehabilitation departments were included in the study. Both balance measures were administered twice 7 days apart. Test-retest reliability was analysed using the weighted κ (κw) statistic for each item and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) for the total scores of both measures. Agreement was expressed as the SEM, minimal detectable change and limits of agreement by Bland and Altman analysis. Test-retest agreements were good to very good for SFBBS and SFPASS, with weighted κ values ranging from 0.75 to 0.89 and 0.66 to 0.84, respectively. The ICCs for the total SFBBS and SFPASS scores were excellent (ICC2,1: SFBBS=0.99; SFPASS=0.93). The SEMs for both measures were less than 10% of the score range; the minimal detectable changes of the SFBBS and SFPASS were 2.83 and 2.16, respectively, indicating that both measures had a small and acceptable measurement error. Both measures showed good reproducibility. These results indicate that the SFBBS and SFPASS are useful for clinicians and researchers for the evaluation of balance performance and to determine whether the change score of an individual with stroke is real.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定慢性卒中患者的七项简短伯格平衡量表(SFBBS)和五项简短姿势评估量表(SFPASS)的重测重现性。来自两个康复部门的52名慢性中风患者被纳入研究。两种平衡测量均隔7天进行两次。使用每个项目的加权κ(κw)统计量和两种方法的总分的组内相关系数(ICC2,1)分析重测信度。一致性表示为SEM,Bland和Altman分析得出的最小可检测变化和一致性极限。重测协议对于SFBBS和SFPASS非常好,加权κ值分别为0.75至0.89和0.66至0.84。 SFBBS和SFPASS总得分的ICC非常好(ICC2.1,SFBBS = 0.99; SFPASS = 0.93)。两种方法的SEM均小于得分范围的10%; SFBBS和SFPASS的最小可检测变化分别为2.83和2.16,这表明这两种措施的测量误差均较小且可以接受。两种方法均显示出良好的可重复性。这些结果表明,SFBBS和SFPASS可用于临床医生和研究人员评估平衡能力并确定中风患者的变化评分是否真实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号