首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refrigeration >In-tube cooling heat transfer of supercritical carbon dioxide. Part 2. Comparison of numerical calculation with different turbulence models
【24h】

In-tube cooling heat transfer of supercritical carbon dioxide. Part 2. Comparison of numerical calculation with different turbulence models

机译:超临界二氧化碳的管内冷却传热。第2部分。不同湍流模型的数值计算比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Major difficulty in the numerical calculation of heat transfers of supercritical carbon dioxide is the proper selection of the turbulence model. Because the thermophysical properties significantly depend on temperature and pressure, conventional turbulence models proposed for constant-property conditions might not be valid for supercritical pressure conditions, and therefore need to be analyzed carefully. Here, four turbulence models were applied to both heating and cooling conditions of supercritical carbon dioxide, and the simulation results of heat transfer coefficient were then compared with experimental data. The JL model (low Reynolds number k-e model by Jones and Launder) showed the best agreement with the experimental data. The three other models (a mixing length model by Bellmore and Reid, and two other low Reynolds number k-e models, respectively, by Launder and Sharma and by Myong and Kasagi) should be re-examined because they use a dimensionless distance from the wall y{sup}+. The turbulent Prandtl number did not significantly affect the calculation results of heat transfer coefficient.
机译:超临界二氧化碳传热数值计算的主要困难是湍流模型的正确选择。因为热物理性质很大程度上取决于温度和压力,所以针对恒定属性条件提出的常规湍流模型对于超临界压力条件可能无效,因此需要仔细分析。在此,将四个湍流模型应用于超临界二氧化碳的加热和冷却条件,然后将传热系数的模拟结果与实验数据进行比较。 JL模型(Jones和Launder的低雷诺数k-e模型)显示出与实验数据的最佳一致性。应该重新检查其他三个模型(Bellmore和Reid的混合长度模型,以及Launder和Sharma以及Myong和Kasagi的另外两个低雷诺数ke模型),因为它们使用了距墙y的无量纲距离。 {sup} +。湍流的普朗特数没有显着影响传热系数的计算结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号