...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Services and Operations Management >Scheduling comparison between multi-objective mathematical models and genetic algorithms approach in the textile industry
【24h】

Scheduling comparison between multi-objective mathematical models and genetic algorithms approach in the textile industry

机译:纺织工业中多目标数学模型与遗传算法的调度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper discusses mixed integer mathematical models and genetic algorithms (GAs) approach for finding an optimal schedule of the bottleneck machine for a company in the textile industry. Single-objective and multi-objective mathematical models and GA are used to obtain an optimal solution to minimise the maximum tardiness (T_(max)). The comparison is made between mathematical models and GA according to the primary and secondary performance measures. Primary performance measure is T_(max), while secondary performance measure is number of tardy jobs (n_t) and total tardiness (TT) values. The experimentation is performed for small and large size problems. All jobs have five different instances except for 150-job and 200-job problems. Due to memory and time limitations, only one sample could be solved for 150-job and 200-job problem. The experimental results indicated that, most of the time GA finds an optimal solution and proposes alternative schedules for both single-objective and multi-objective mathematical models.
机译:本文讨论了混合整数数学模型和遗传算法(GA)方法,用于为纺织行业的公司找到瓶颈机器的最佳计划。使用单目标和多目标数学模型和GA来获得最优解决方案,以最大程度地减少最大拖延(T_(max))。根据主要和次要性能指标对数学模型和GA进行比较。主要绩效指标是T_(max),而次要绩效指标是迟到的作业数(n_t)和总拖延(TT)值。针对大小问题进行实验。除了150个工作和200个工作的问题外,所有工作都有五个不同的实例。由于内存和时间的限制,只能解决150个工作和200个工作问题的一个样本。实验结果表明,GA大部分时间都在寻找最优解,并为单目标和多目标数学模型提出了替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号