首页> 外文期刊>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology >Etiologies of pediatric craniofacial injuries: A comparison of injuries involving all-terrain vehicles and golf carts
【24h】

Etiologies of pediatric craniofacial injuries: A comparison of injuries involving all-terrain vehicles and golf carts

机译:小儿颅面部损伤的病因:全地形车和高尔夫球车的伤害比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine incidence and etiologies of craniofacial injuries in the pediatric population through comparison of injuries caused by all-terrain vehicles and golf cart trauma. Study design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Subjects and methods: Retrospective review of pediatric traumas at a tertiary academic medical center from 2003 to 2012 identified 196 patients whose injuries resulted from accidents involving either all-terrain vehicles or golf carts. Data was collected and variables such as age, gender, driver vs. passenger, location of accident, Glasgow coma scale, Injury severity scale, Abbreviated injury scale, and presence or absence of helmet use were examined. Results: 196 pediatric patients were identified: 68 patients had injuries resulting from golf cart accidents, and 128 patients from ATV accidents. 66.4% of ATV-related traumas were male, compared to 52.9% of golf cart-related traumas. Ages of injured patients were similar between the two modalities with average age of ATV traumas 10.8 (??4.0) years and golf cart traumas 10.0 (??4.6) years. Caucasians were most commonly involved in both ATV (79.7%) and golf cart traumas (85.3%). 58.6% of all ATV related trauma and 69.1% of all golf cart trauma resulted in craniofacial injuries. The most common craniofacial injury was a closed head injury with brief loss of consciousness, occurring in 46.1% of the ATV traumas and 54.4% of the golf cart traumas. Temporal bone fractures were the second most common type of craniofacial injury, occurring in 5.5% of ATV accidents and 7.4% of the golf cart traumas. Length of hospital stay and, cases requiring surgery and severity scores were similar between both populations. Intensive care admissions and injury severity scores approached but not reach statistical significance (0.096 and 0.083, respectively). The only statistically significant differences between the two modalities were helmet use (P=0.00018%) and days requiring ventilator assistance (P=0.025). Conclusions: ATVs and golf carts are often exempt from the safety features and regulations required of motor vehicles, and ATV and golf cart accidents represent a significant portion of pediatric traumas. This study found that ATV and golf cart accidents contribute significantly to craniofacial trauma requiring hospitalization, with resultant morbidity and mortality. Further investigation of these injuries and their prevention in the pediatric population is needed before efforts to promote effective safety regulations for such vehicles in the future can be addressed. ? 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
机译:目的:通过比较全地形车和高尔夫球车造成的伤害来确定小儿颅面部受伤的发生率和病因。研究设计:带有图表审查的案例系列。地点:1级创伤中心。主题和方法:2003年至2012年,在一家三级学术医疗中心对儿童创伤进行了回顾性研究,确定了196名因全地形车或高尔夫球车事故导致受伤的患者。收集数据并检查变量,例如年龄,性别,驾驶员与乘客,事故地点,格拉斯哥昏迷量表,损伤严重程度量表,轻度损伤量表以及是否使用头盔。结果:确定了196名儿科患者:其中68例因高尔夫球车事故受伤,而128例因ATV事故受伤。 ATV相关的创伤中有66.4%是男性,而高尔夫球车相关的创伤中有52.9%是男性。两种方式之间受伤患者的年龄相似,ATV创伤的平均年龄为10.8(?4.0)岁,高尔夫球车创伤的平均年龄为10.0(?4.6)岁。高加索人最常见于ATV(79.7%)和高尔夫球车外伤(85.3%)。所有ATV相关创伤中有58.6%和所有高尔夫球车创伤中有69.1%导致颅面损伤。最常见的颅面损伤是闭合性颅脑损伤,短暂失去知觉,发生在ATV创伤的46.1%和高尔夫球车创伤的54.4%。颞骨骨折是第二大常见的颅面部损伤类型,发生在5.5%的ATV事故和7.4%的高尔夫球车损伤中。两种人群的住院时间,需要手术的病例和严重程度评分相似。重症监护病房和损伤严重程度得分均达到但未达到统计学显着性(分别为0.096和0.083)。两种方式之间唯一的统计上显着差异是头盔使用(P = 0.00018%)和需要呼吸机辅助的天数(P = 0.025)。结论:ATV和高尔夫球车通常不受机动车辆要求的安全功能和法规约束,并且ATV和高尔夫球车事故占小儿创伤的很大一部分。这项研究发现,沙滩车和高尔夫球车事故对需要住院的颅面部创伤有重大影响,从而导致发病率和死亡率。为了进一步解决此类车辆的有效安全法规,需要进一步调查这些伤害及其在儿科人群中的预防。 ? 2013爱思唯尔爱尔兰有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号