首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
【24h】

Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.

机译:使用Lunar,Hologic和Norland仪器进行体重变化期间,全身骨矿物质的双能X射线骨密度仪测量异常。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A previous study showed that measurements of total-body bone mineral changes made with a Hologic QDR 1000W were unreliable when the subjects underwent weight change. The study has been extended to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) apparatus from other manufacturers. Re-analysis of published results during weight loss using a Lunar DPX showed that they varied with the software used. Using the Extended mode, there was a 1% loss of bone mineral areal density (BMD), but no significant change in bone mineral content (BMC) or bone area (BA) following a weight loss of 16 kg, whereas the use of the Standard mode led to a larger fall of BMC and BMD. Similar findings arose from the consideration of two studies using Norland XR 26 HS absorptiometers. On the other hand, separation of two groups with similar weight changes from the population studied with a Hologic QDR 1000W confirmed that BMC changed directly with weight, but there was an inverse relationship for BMD, owing to an inappropriate change of BA. The use of Hologic Enhanced and Standard software modes led to significant differences in initial readings and measured changes. With each instrument there was a strong correlation between changes in BA and changes in BMC. When 6 kg of lard was wrapped around the limbs of volunteers or a semi-anthropomorphic phantom to simulate weight change, there were spurious increases of measured BMC and BA by about 5% with each instrument. There were no changes of BMD with Lunar, variable results with Norland, but decreases with Hologic. The results observed in vivo could be explained by the effects of fat changes, without there being any real change of bone mineral. Changes of BMD in the skeleton of the phantom were underestimated with all three brands. The anomaly observed with the Hologic QDR 1000W is less apparent with a Lunar DPX or a Norland XR 26, but there are sufficient uncertainties for all total-body measurements during weight change to be treated with suspicion.
机译:先前的研究表明,当受试者进行体重变化时,使用Hologic QDR 1000W进行的全身骨矿物质变化的测量是不可靠的。该研究已扩展到其他制造商的双能X射线吸收仪(DXA)。使用Lunar DPX对减肥过程中发表的结果进行的重新分析显示,它们随所用软件的不同而不同。使用扩展模式时,体重减轻16公斤后,骨矿物质面密度(BMD)损失了1%,但骨矿物质含量(BMC)或骨面积(BA)却没有明显变化,而使用标准模式导致BMC和BMD大幅下降。考虑使用Norland XR 26 HS吸收仪进行的两项研究也得出了类似的发现。另一方面,从使用Hologic QDR 1000W进行研究的人群中,将体重变化相似的两组分开,证实BMC随体重而直接变化,但由于BA的不适当变化,BMD呈反比关系。使用Hologic增强版和标准版软件模式会导致初始读数和测得的变化存在显着差异。每种仪器在BA变化和BMC变化之间都有很强的相关性。当将6公斤猪油缠在志愿者的四肢或半拟人体模上以模拟体重变化时,每种仪器的BMC和BA的假性增加约5%。月球的BMD没有变化,诺兰的结果却没有变化,而Hologic的则减少了。体内观察到的结果可以用脂肪变化的影响来解释,而骨骼矿物质却没有任何真正的变化。这三个品牌的模型骨架中BMD的变化都被低估了。用Hologic QDR 1000W观察到的异常在Lunar DPX或Norland XR 26上不太明显,但是对于体重变化期间的所有全身测量,有足够的不确定性可以怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号