首页> 外文期刊>British journal of psychology >Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria
【24h】

Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria

机译:由于决策标准,非专业和专业搜索者在多目标视觉搜索性能上的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Professional visual searches, such as those conducted by airport security personnel, often demand highly accurate performance. As many factors can hinder accuracy, it is critical to understand the potential influences. Here, we examined how explicit decision-making criteria might affect multiple-target search performance. Non-professional searchers (college undergraduates) and professional searchers (airport security officers) classified trials as safe' or dangerous', in one of two conditions. Those in the one=dangerous' condition classified trials as dangerous if they found one or two targets, and those in the one=safe' condition only classified trials as dangerous if they found two targets. The data suggest an important role of context that may be mediated by experience; non-professional searchers were more likely to miss a second target in the one=dangerous condition (i.e., when finding a second found target did not change the classification), whereas professional searchers were more likely to miss a second in the one=safe condition.
机译:专业的视觉搜索,例如由机场安全人员进行的视觉搜索,通常需要高度准确的性能。由于许多因素都会影响准确性,因此了解潜在影响至关重要。在这里,我们研究了明确的决策标准如何影响多目标搜索性能。非专业搜索者(大学生)和专业搜索者(机场安全员)在两种情况之一中将审判分类为“安全”或“危险”。处于“危险”状态的人如果找到一个或两个目标,则将试验分类为危险,而处于“危险”状态的人如果找到两个目标,则将试验分类为危险。数据表明,情境的重要作用可以由经验来调节。非专业搜索者更可能在一个=危险的情况下错过第二个目标(即,当找到第二个找到的目标并没有改变类别时),而专业搜索者更可能在一个=安全的条件下错过第二个目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号