首页> 外文期刊>International journal of methods in psychiatric research >The validity of military screening for mental health problems: diagnostic accuracy of the PCL, K10 and AUDIT scales in an entire military population
【24h】

The validity of military screening for mental health problems: diagnostic accuracy of the PCL, K10 and AUDIT scales in an entire military population

机译:军事筛查精​​神健康问题的有效性:PCL,K10和AUDIT量表在整个军事人群中的诊断准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Depression, alcohol use disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are serious issues among military personnel due to their impact on operational capability and individual well-being. Several military forces screen for these disorders using scales including the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL). However, it is unknown whether established cutoffs apply to military populations. This study is the first to test the diagnostic accuracy of these three scales in a population-based military cohort. A large sample of currently-serving Australian Defence Force (ADF) Navy, Army and Air Force personnel (n=24,481) completed the K10, AUDIT and PCL-C (civilian version). Then, a stratified sub-sample (n=1798) completed a structured diagnostic interview detecting 30-day disorder. Data were weighted to represent the ADF population (n=50,049). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses suggested all three scales had acceptable sensitivity and specificity, with areas under the curve from 0.75 to 0.93. AUDIT and K10 screening cutoffs closely paralleled established cutoffs, whereas the PCL-C screening cutoff resembled that recommended for US military personnel. These self-report scales represent a cost-effective and clinically-useful means of screening personnel for disorder. Military populations may need lower cutoffs than civilians to screen for PTSD. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:抑郁,酒精使用障碍和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在军事人员中是严重问题,因为它们会影响作战能力和个人福祉。几支部队使用凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K10),酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)和创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL)来筛选这些疾病。但是,尚不确定的界限是否适用于军事人口。这项研究是首次在以人口为基础的军事队列中测试这三个量表的诊断准确性。目前在职的澳大利亚国防军(ADF)海军,陆军和空军人员(n = 24,481)的大量样本完成了K10,AUDIT和PCL-C(民用版本)的安装。然后,分层子样本(n = 1798)完成了结构性诊断访谈,以检测30天疾病。数据加权以代表ADF人群(n = 50049)。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,所有三个量表均具有可接受的灵敏度和特异性,曲线下面积在0.75至0.93之间。 AUDIT和K10筛选截止与已建立的截止非常相似,而PCL-C筛选截止与向美国军事人员推荐的相似。这些自我报告量表代表了筛查人员疾病的一种经济有效且临床有用的方法。军事人群可能需要比平民更低的门槛来筛查PTSD。版权所有(c)2014 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号