...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT.
【24h】

Enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT.

机译:肝内胆管癌的增强模式:超声造影与增强CT的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the enhancement pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). 40 pathologically proven ICC lesions in 40 patients were evaluated retrospectively with both CEUS and CECT. The enhancement level and pattern in the dynamic phases on both CEUS and CECT were analysed. The diagnostic results of CEUS and CECT before pathological examination were also recorded. During arterial phases, the number of lesions that appeared as (i) peripheral irregular rim-like hyperenhancement, (ii) diffuse heterogeneous hyperenhancement, (iii) diffuse homogeneous hyperenhancement and (iv) diffuse heterogeneous hypoenhancement were 19 (47.5%), 9 (22.5%), 5 (12.5%) and 7 (17.5%), respectively, on CEUS, and 22 (55.0%), 3 (7.5%), 2 (5.0%) and 13 (32.5%), respectively, on CECT (p = 0.125). In the portal phase, the number of lesions showing hyperenhancement and hypoenhancement were 1 (2.5%) and 39 (97.5%), respectively, on CEUS, and 15 (37.5%) and 25 (62.5%) on CECT (p = 0.0001). CEUS made a correct diagnosis in 32 (80.0%) lesions before pathological examination; CECT made a correct diagnosis in 27 (67.5%) lesions (p = 0.18). In conclusion, the enhancement patterns of ICC on CEUS were consistent with those on CECT in the arterial phase, whereas in the portal phase ICC faded out more obviously on CEUS than on CECT. CEUS had the same accuracy as CECT in diagnosing ICCs, and so can be used as a new modality for the characterization of ICC.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较对比增强超声(CEUS)和对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)对肝内胆管癌(ICC)的增强方式。 CEUS和CECT均对40例经病理证实的ICC病变进行了回顾性评估。分析了CEUS和CECT在动态阶段的增强水平和模式。还记录了病理检查前CEUS和CECT的诊断结果。在动脉期,表现为(i)周围不规则边缘样过度增强,(ii)弥散性异质性过度增强,(iii)弥散性均质性过度增强和(iv)弥散性异质性过度增强表现为19个(47.5%),9( CEUS分别为22.5%),5(12.5%)和7(17.5%),CECT分别为22(55.0%),3(7.5%),2(5.0%)和13(32.5%) (p = 0.125)。在门静脉期,CEUS表现为过度增强和过度增强的病变数量分别为1(2.5%)和39(97.5%),而CECT表现为15(37.5%)和25(62.5%)(p = 0.0001) 。在进行病理检查之前,CEUS对32个(80.0%)病变进行了正确的诊断; CECT对27个(67.5%)病变进行了正确诊断(p = 0.18)。总之,在动脉期,ICS在CEUS上的增强模式与CECT上的增强模式一致,而在门脉期,CEUS上的ICC淡出比在CECT上更明显。 CEUS在诊断ICC方面具有与CECT相同的准确性,因此可以用作表征ICC的新方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号